CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 33EXPL: 0CVE-2015-0289 – openssl: PKCS7 NULL pointer dereference
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-0289
The PKCS#7 implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not properly handle a lack of outer ContentInfo, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) by leveraging an application that processes arbitrary PKCS#7 data and providing malformed data with ASN.1 encoding, related to crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c and crypto/pkcs7/pk7_lib.c. La implementación PKCS#7 en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1m, y 1.0.2 anterior a 1.0.2a no maneja correctamente la falta de ContentInfo exterior, lo que permite a atacantes causar una denegación de servicio (referencia a puntero nulo y caída de aplicación) mediante el aprovechamiento de una aplicación que procesa datos PKCS#7 arbitrarios y la provisión de datos malformados con una codificación ASN.1, relacionado con crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c y crypto/pkcs7/pk7_lib.c. A NULL pointer dereference was found in the way OpenSSL handled certain PKCS#7 inputs. An attacker able to make an application using OpenSSL verify, decrypt, or parse a specially crafted PKCS#7 input could cause that application to crash. TLS/SSL clients and servers using OpenSSL were not affected by this flaw. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10680 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Jun/msg00002.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/152733.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/152734.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/152844.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-May/156823.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/ • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 18%CPEs: 22EXPL: 1CVE-2015-0292 – openssl: integer underflow leading to buffer overflow in base64 decoding
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-0292
Integer underflow in the EVP_DecodeUpdate function in crypto/evp/encode.c in the base64-decoding implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted base64 data that triggers a buffer overflow. Subdesbordamiento de enteros en la función EVP_DecodeUpdate en crypto/evp/encode.c en la implementación base64-decoding en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0m, y 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1h permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (corrupción de memoria) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de datos base64 manipulados que provocan un desbordamiento de buffer. An integer underflow flaw, leading to a buffer overflow, was found in the way OpenSSL decoded malformed Base64-encoded inputs. An attacker able to make an application using OpenSSL decode a specially crafted Base64-encoded input (such as a PEM file) could use this flaw to cause the application to crash. Note: this flaw is not exploitable via the TLS/SSL protocol because the data being transferred is not Base64-encoded. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10680 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/152733.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/152734.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/152844.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143213830203296&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143748090628601&w=2 http://marc.inf • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 44%CPEs: 33EXPL: 0CVE-2015-0293 – openssl: assertion failure in SSLv2 servers
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-0293
The SSLv2 implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (s2_lib.c assertion failure and daemon exit) via a crafted CLIENT-MASTER-KEY message. La implementación SSLv2 en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1m, y 1.0.2 anterior a 1.0.2a permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (fallo de aserción s2_lib.c y salida del demonio) a través de un mensaje CLIENT-MASTER-KEY manipulado. A denial of service flaw was found in the way OpenSSL handled SSLv2 handshake messages. A remote attacker could use this flaw to cause a TLS/SSL server using OpenSSL to exit on a failed assertion if it had both the SSLv2 protocol and EXPORT-grade cipher suites enabled. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10680 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Jun/msg00002.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/152733.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/152734.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/152844.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-May/156823.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 94%CPEs: 26EXPL: 1CVE-2015-0204 – openssl: only allow ephemeral RSA keys in export ciphersuites (FREAK)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-0204
The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote SSL servers to conduct RSA-to-EXPORT_RSA downgrade attacks and facilitate brute-force decryption by offering a weak ephemeral RSA key in a noncompliant role, related to the "FREAK" issue. NOTE: the scope of this CVE is only client code based on OpenSSL, not EXPORT_RSA issues associated with servers or other TLS implementations. La función ssl3_get_key_exchange en s3_clnt.c en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.0p y 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1k permite a servidores SSL remotos llevar a cabo ataques de degradación de versión RSA-a-EXPORT_RSA y facilitar el descifrado de fuerza bruta ofreciendo una clave RSA efímera débil en un rol no sumiso, relacionado con el caso "FREAK" . NOTA: el alcance de esta CVE es solo código cliente basado en OpenSSL, no un problema de EXPORT_RSA asociado con servidores u otras implementaciones TLS. It was discovered that OpenSSL would accept ephemeral RSA keys when using non-export RSA cipher suites. • https://github.com/AbhishekGhosh/FREAK-Attack-CVE-2015-0204-Testing-Script http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10679 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Apr/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-01/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.ht • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade') •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 12%CPEs: 26EXPL: 1CVE-2014-3570 – openssl: Bignum squaring may produce incorrect results
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3570
The BN_sqr implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k does not properly calculate the square of a BIGNUM value, which might make it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via unspecified vectors, related to crypto/bn/asm/mips.pl, crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-gcc.c, and crypto/bn/bn_asm.c. La implementación BN_sqr en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0p, y 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1k no calcula correctamente el cuadrado de un valor BIGNUM, lo que podría facilitar a atacantes remotos superar los mecanismos de protección criptográficos a través de vectores no especificados, relacionado con crypto/bn/asm/mips.pl, crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-gcc.c, y crypto/bn/bn_asm.c. It was found that OpenSSL's BigNumber Squaring implementation could produce incorrect results under certain special conditions. This flaw could possibly affect certain OpenSSL library functionality, such as RSA blinding. Note that this issue occurred rarely and with a low probability, and there is currently no known way of exploiting it. • https://github.com/uthrasri/CVE-2014-3570 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10679 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Apr/msg00001.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/147938.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148363.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-01/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html http://lis • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •