CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 93%CPEs: 84EXPL: 1CVE-2016-3718 – ImageMagick Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3718
The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted image. Los codificadores (1) HTTP y (2) FTP en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permiten a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de falsificación de peticiones del lado del servidor (SSRF) a través de una imagen manipulada. A server-side request forgery flaw was discovered in the way ImageMagick processed certain images. A remote attacker could exploit this flaw to mislead an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities into, for example, performing HTTP(S) requests or opening FTP sessions via specially crafted images. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows attackers to perform server-side request forgery (SSRF) via a crafted image. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 37EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0264 – JDK: buffer overflow vulnerability in the IBM JVM
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0264
Buffer overflow in the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. Desbordamiento de buffer en Java Virtual Machine (JVM) en IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 en versiones anteriores a SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 en versiones anteriores a SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40) y 8 en versiones anteriores a SR3 (8.0.3.0) permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de vectores no especificados. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00042.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00061.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 32EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0363 – JDK: insecure use of invoke method in CORBA component, incorrect CVE-2013-3009 fix
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0363
The com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) uses the invoke method of the java.lang.reflect.Method class in an AccessController doPrivileged block, which allows remote attackers to call setSecurityManager and bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors related to a Proxy object instance implementing the java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler interface. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-3009. La clase com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate en IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 en versiones anteriores a SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 en versiones anteriores a SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40) y 8 en versiones anteriores a SR3 (8.0.3.0) utiliza el método de invocación de la clase java.lang.reflect.Method en un bloque AccessController doPrivileged, lo que permite a atacantes remotos llamar a setSecurityManager y eludir un mecanismo de protección sandbox a través de vectores relacionados con una instancia a un objeto Proxy implementando la interfaz java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2013-3009. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00042.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00061.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 7%CPEs: 34EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0376 – JDK: insecure deserialization in CORBA, incorrect CVE-2013-5456 fix
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0376
The com.ibm.rmi.io.SunSerializableFactory class in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) does not properly deserialize classes in an AccessController doPrivileged block, which allows remote attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism and execute arbitrary code as demonstrated by the readValue method of the com.ibm.rmi.io.ValueHandlerPool.ValueHandlerSingleton class, which implements the javax.rmi.CORBA.ValueHandler interface. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-5456. La clase com.ibm.rmi.io.SunSerializableFactory en IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 en versiones anteriores a SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 en versiones anteriores a SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40) y 8 en versiones anteriores a SR3 (8.0.3.0) no deserializa correctamente las clases en un bloque AccessController doPrivileged, lo que permite a atacantes remotos eludir un mecanismo de protección sandbox y ejecutar código arbitrario como se demuestra mediante el método readValue de la clase com.ibm.rmi.io.ValueHandlerPool.ValueHandlerSingleton, lo que implementa la interfaz javax.rmi.CORBA.ValueHandler. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2013-5456. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00042.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00061.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05 •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0695 – OpenJDK: insufficient DSA key parameters checks (Security, 8138593)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0695
Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99, and 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; and JRockit R28.3.9 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via vectors related to Security. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99 y 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; y JRockit R28.3.9 permite a atacantes remotos afectar a la confidencialidad a través de vectores relacionados con Security. It was discovered that the Security component in OpenJDK failed to check the digest algorithm strength when generating DSA signatures. The use of a digest weaker than the key strength could lead to the generation of signatures that were weaker than expected. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05 •