Page 6 of 483 results (0.018 seconds)

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 28EXPL: 0

A security regression of CVE-2019-9636 was discovered in python since commit d537ab0ff9767ef024f26246899728f0116b1ec3 affecting versions 2.7, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 and from v3.8.0a4 through v3.8.0b1, which still allows an attacker to exploit CVE-2019-9636 by abusing the user and password parts of a URL. When an application parses user-supplied URLs to store cookies, authentication credentials, or other kind of information, it is possible for an attacker to provide specially crafted URLs to make the application locate host-related information (e.g. cookies, authentication data) and send them to a different host than where it should, unlike if the URLs had been correctly parsed. The result of an attack may vary based on the application. Se descubrió una regresión de seguridad de CVE-2019-9636 en python desde commit con ID d537ab0ff9767ef024f26246899728f0116b1ec3 que afecta a las versiones 2.7, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 y de v3.8.0a4 a v3.8.0b1, el cual permite a un atacante explotar CVE-2019-9636 violando las partes usuario (user) y contraseña (password) de una URL. Cuando una aplicación analiza las URL proporcionadas por el usuario para almacenar cookies, credenciales de autenticación u otro tipo de información, es posible que un atacante proporcione URL especialmente creadas para que la aplicación ubique información relacionada con el host (por ejemplo, cookies, datos de autenticación) y envíe a un host diferente al que debería, a diferencia de si las URL se analizaron correctamente. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00042.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00040.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1587 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1700 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2437 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10160 https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/250b62acc59921d399f0db47db3b462cd6037e09 https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/8d0ef0b5edeae52960c7ed05ae8a12388324f87e • CWE-172: Encoding Error CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 33EXPL: 0

While investigating bug PROTON-2014, we discovered that under some circumstances Apache Qpid Proton versions 0.9 to 0.27.0 (C library and its language bindings) can connect to a peer anonymously using TLS *even when configured to verify the peer certificate* while used with OpenSSL versions before 1.1.0. This means that an undetected man in the middle attack could be constructed if an attacker can arrange to intercept TLS traffic. Mientras investigábamos el error PROTON-2014, descubrimos que en algunas circunstancias las versiones de Apache Qpid Proton 0.9 a 0.27.0 (librería de C y sus adaptaciones de lenguaje) pueden conectarse a un peer de forma anónima utilizando TLS *incluso cuando está configurado para verificar el certificado del peer* mientras se utiliza con versiones de OpenSSL anteriores a la 1.1.0. Esto significa que un ataque man in the middle podría ser construido si un atacante puede interceptar el tráfico TLS. A cryptographic weakness was discovered in qpid-proton's use of TLS. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/23/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108044 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0886 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1398 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1399 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1400 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2777 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2778 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2779 https://access.redhat.com/errata/ • CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 mishandles the "each participant verifies that the received scalar is within a range, and that the received group element is a valid point on the curve being used" protection mechanism, aka a "Dragonblood" issue, a similar issue to CVE-2019-9498 and CVE-2019-9499. FreeRADIUS versión anterior a 3.0.19 no maneja correctamente el mecanismo de protección "cada participante verifica que el escalar recibido está dentro de un rango, y que el elemento de grupo recibido es un punto válido en la curva que se está utilizando", alias "Dragonblood", este problema es similar a CVE-2019-9498 y CVE-2019-9499. A vulnerability was found in FreeRadius. An invalid curve attack allows an attacker to authenticate as any user, without knowing the password. FreeRADIUS doesn't verify whether the received elliptic curve point is valid. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-04/msg00033.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1131 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1142 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695748 https://freeradius.org/release_notes/?br=3.0.x&re=3.0.19 https://freeradius.org/security https://papers.math • CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 12EXPL: 1

A vulnerability was found in mod_auth_mellon before v0.14.2. If Apache is configured as a reverse proxy and mod_auth_mellon is configured to only let through authenticated users (with the require valid-user directive), adding special HTTP headers that are normally used to start the special SAML ECP (non-browser based) can be used to bypass authentication. Se ha detectado una vulnerabilidad en mod_auth_mellon, en versiones anteriores a la v0.14.2. Si Apache está configurado como proxy inverso y mod_auth_mellon está configurado para que solo deje acceder a los usuarios autenticados (con la directiva "require valid-user"), la adición de cabeceras HTTP especiales que se suelen emplear para iniciar el SAML ECP especial (no basado en el navegador) puede emplearse para omitir la autenticación. A vulnerability was found in mod_auth_mellon. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0959 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0746 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0766 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0985 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3878 https://github.com/Uninett/mod_auth_mellon/pull/196 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CNW5YMC5TLWVWNJEY6AIWNSNPRAMWPQJ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists. • CWE-287: Improper Authentication CWE-305: Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness •

CVSS: 7.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0

It was found that the forceput operator could be extracted from the DefineResource method in ghostscript before 9.27. A specially crafted PostScript file could use this flaw in order to, for example, have access to the file system outside of the constrains imposed by -dSAFER. Se ha observado que el operador forceput podía ser extraído del método DefineResource en ghostscript en las versiones anteriores a la 9.27. Un archivo PostScript especialmente manipulado podría explotar este error, por ejemplo, para obtener acceso al sistema de archivos fuera de las restricciones impuestas por -dSAFER. It was found that the forceput operator could be extracted from the DefineResource method. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00018.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152367/Slackware-Security-Advisory-ghostscript-Updates.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0652 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0971 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700576 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3838 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2 • CWE-648: Incorrect Use of Privileged APIs •