Page 6 of 52 results (0.010 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 52%CPEs: 87EXPL: 1

A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients. Se ha encontrado un fallo de denegación de servicio en OpenSSL en las versiones 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 hasta la 1.0.2h y la 1.1.0 en la forma en la que el protocolo TLS/SSL definió el procesamiento de paquetes ALERT durante una negociación de conexión. Un atacante remoto podría emplear este fallo para hacer que un servidor TLS/SSL consuma una cantidad excesiva de recursos de CPU y fracase a la hora de aceptar conexiones de otros clientes. A denial of service flaw was found in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. • https://github.com/cujanovic/CVE-2016-8610-PoC http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0574.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93841 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037084 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

An information disclosure vulnerability was found in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform before 7.0.4. It was discovered that when configuring RBAC and marking information as sensitive, users with a Monitor role are able to view the sensitive information. Se ha detectado una vulnerabilidad de divulgación de información en JBoss Enterprise Application Platform en versiones anteriores a la 7.0.4. Se ha descubierto que, al configurar RBAC y marcar información como sensible, los usuarios con rol Monitor pueden visualizar dicha información sensible It was discovered that when configuring RBAC and marking information as sensitive, users with a Monitor role are able to view the sensitive information. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0170.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0171.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0172.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0173.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0244.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0245.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0246.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0247.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0250.html http://www • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 1%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0

The getObject method of the javax.jms.ObjectMessage class in the (1) JMS Core client, (2) Artemis broker, and (3) Artemis REST component in Apache ActiveMQ Artemis before 1.4.0 might allow remote authenticated users with permission to send messages to the Artemis broker to deserialize arbitrary objects and execute arbitrary code by leveraging gadget classes being present on the Artemis classpath. El método getObject de la clase javax.jms.ObjectMessage en el (1) cliente JMS Core, (2) broker Artemis y (3) componente Artemis REST en Apache ActiveMQ Artemis en versiones anteriores a 1.4.0 podría permitir a usuarios remotos autenticados con permiso, mandar mensajes al broker Artemis para deserializar objetos arbitrarios y ejecutar código arbitrario aprovechando clases de gadget presentes en la ruta de clases Artemis. It was found that use of a JMS ObjectMessage does not safely handle user supplied data when deserializing objects. A remote attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the application using a JMS ObjectMessage. • http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/activemq-users/201609.mbox/%3CCAH6wpnqzeNtpykT7emtDU1-GV7AvjFP5-YroWcCC4UZyQEFvtA%40mail.gmail.com%3E http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93142 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1834 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1835 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1836 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1837 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3455 https://access.redhat& • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

The domain controller in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x before 7.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges by leveraging failure to propagate administrative RBAC configuration to all slaves. El controlador de dominios en Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.2 permite a usuarios remotos autenticados obtener privilegios aprovechando el fallo de propagación de configuración RBAC administrativa a todos los esclavos. The domain controller will not propagate its administrative RBAC configuration to some slaves. An attacker could use this to escalate their privileges. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1838.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1839.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1840.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1841.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3456 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3458 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359014 https://access.redhat.c • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

CRLF injection vulnerability in the Undertow web server in WildFly 10.0.0, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x before 7.0.2, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. Vulnerabilidad de inyección CRLF en el servidor web Undertow en WildFly 10.0.0, tal como se utiliza en Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.2, permite a atacantes remotos inyectar cabeceras HTTP arbitrarias y llevar a cabo ataques de separación de respuesta HTTP a través de vectores no especificados. It was reported that EAP 7 Application Server/Undertow web server is vulnerable to the injection of arbitrary HTTP headers, and also response splitting, due to insufficient sanitization and validation of user input before the input is used as part of an HTTP header value. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1838.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1839.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1840.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1841.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92894 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036758 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3456 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017: • CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •