CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 9%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9511 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9511
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a la manipulación del tamaño de la ventana y la manipulación de priorización de flujo, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00014.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2692 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 82%CPEs: 55EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9514 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9514
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de reinicio, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante abre una serie de secuencias y envía una solicitud no válida sobre cada secuencia que debería solicitar una secuencia de tramas RST_STREAM del par. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00076.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 61EXPL: 0CVE-2019-14379 – jackson-databind: default typing mishandling leading to remote code execution
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-14379
SubTypeValidator.java in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.9.2 mishandles default typing when ehcache is used (because of net.sf.ehcache.transaction.manager.DefaultTransactionManagerLookup), leading to remote code execution. El archivo SubTypeValidator.java en jackson-databind de FasterXML en versiones anteriores a la 2.9.9.2 maneja inapropiadamente la escritura predeterminada cuando se usa ehcache (debido a net.sf.ehcache.transaction.manager.DefaultTransactionManagerLookup), lo que conlleva a la ejecución de código remoto. A flaw was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind, where it would permit polymorphic deserialization of malicious objects using the ehcache and logback JNDI gadgets when used in conjunction with polymorphic type handling methods such as `enableDefaultTyping()` or when @JsonTypeInfo is using `Id.CLASS` or `Id.MINIMAL_CLASS` or in any other way which ObjectMapper.readValue might instantiate objects from unsafe sources. An attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Mar/23 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2824 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2743 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2858 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2935 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2936 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2937 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2938 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2998 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2 • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 28EXPL: 0CVE-2019-10184 – undertow: Information leak in requests for directories without trailing slashes
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10184
undertow before version 2.0.23.Final is vulnerable to an information leak issue. Web apps may have their directory structures predicted through requests without trailing slashes via the api. Undertow en versiones anteriores a la 2.0.23.Final es vulnerable a un problema de fuga de información. Las aplicaciones web pueden tener sus estructuras de directorio predecibles a través de solicitudes sin barras finales mediante la API. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2935 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2936 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2937 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2938 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2998 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3044 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3045 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3046 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3050 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA • CWE-862: Missing Authorization •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2018-14642 – undertow: Infoleak in some circumstances where Undertow can serve data from a random buffer
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-14642
An information leak vulnerability was found in Undertow. If all headers are not written out in the first write() call then the code that handles flushing the buffer will always write out the full contents of the writevBuffer buffer, which may contain data from previous requests. Se ha encontrado una vulnerabilidad de fuga de información en Undertow. Si no están escritas todas las cabeceras en la primera llamada write(), el código que maneja las escrituras al búfer siempre escribirá el contenido completo del búfer writevBuffer, que podría contener datos de peticiones anteriores. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0362 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0364 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0365 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0380 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1106 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1107 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1108 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1140 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-14642 https://access.redhat.com&#x • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •