CVE-2019-2684 – OpenJDK: Incorrect skeleton selection in RMI registry server-side dispatch handling (RMI, 8218453)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-2684
Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: RMI). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 7u211, 8u202, 11.0.2 and 12; Java SE Embedded: 8u201. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Java SE, Java SE Embedded accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets (in Java SE 8), that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00007.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00013.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/09/01/4 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0959 https://access.re •
CVE-2019-2698 – Oracle Java Runtime Environment - Heap Corruption During TTF font Rendering in GlyphIterator::setCurrGlyphID
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-2698
Vulnerability in the Java SE component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: 2D). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 7u211 and 8u202. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Java SE. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets (in Java SE 8), that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46723 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00013.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0959 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1146 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1163 https:/& • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVE-2019-3845 – katello-installer-base: QMF methods exposed to goferd via qdrouterd
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-3845
A lack of access control was found in the message queues maintained by Satellite's QPID broker and used by katello-agent in versions before Satellite 6.2, Satellite 6.1 optional and Satellite Capsule 6.1. A malicious user authenticated to a host registered to Satellite (or Capsule) can use this flaw to access QMF methods to any host also registered to Satellite (or Capsule) and execute privileged commands. Se encontró una falta de control de acceso en las colas de mensajes mantenidas por el broker QPID de Satellite y usadas por katello-agent en versiones anteriores a Satellite 6.2, Satellite 6.1 opcional y Satellite Capsule 6.1. Un usuario malintencionado autenticado en un host registrado en Satellite (o Capsule) puede usar este fallo para acceder a los métodos de QMF en cualquier host también registrado en Satellite (o Capsule) y ejecutar comandos privilegiados. A lack of access control was found in the message queues maintained by Satellite's QPID broker and used by katello-agent. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1223 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3845 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-3845 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684275 • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVE-2018-12549 – JDK: missing null check when accelerating Unsafe calls
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-12549
In Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.11.0, the OpenJ9 JIT compiler may incorrectly omit a null check on the receiver object of an Unsafe call when accelerating it. En Eclipse OpenJ9 0.11.0, el compilador JIT de OpenJ9 podría omitir incorrectamente una comprobación nula en el objeto recibidor de una llamada no segura al acelerarla. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0469 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0472 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0640 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1238 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=544019 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-12549 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685717 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-111: Direct Use of Unsafe JNI •
CVE-2018-12547 – JDK: buffer overflow in jio_snprintf() and jio_vsnprintf()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-12547
In Eclipse OpenJ9, prior to the 0.12.0 release, the jio_snprintf() and jio_vsnprintf() native methods ignored the length parameter. This affects existing APIs that called the functions to exceed the allocated buffer. This functions were not directly callable by non-native user code. En Eclipse OpenJ9, en versiones anteriores a la 0.12.0, los métodos nativos jio_snprintf() y jio_vsnprintf() ignoraban el parámetro length. Esto afecta a las API existentes que llamaban a las funciones para sobrepasar el búfer asignado. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0469 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0472 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0473 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0474 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0640 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1238 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=543659 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-12547 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685611 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •