Page 6 of 114 results (0.010 seconds)

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742, which addressed the CRLF vector, but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF. Ruby versiones hasta 2.4.7, versiones 2.5.x hasta 2.5.6 y versiones 2.6.x hasta 2.6.4, permite HTTP Response Splitting. Si un programa que utiliza WEBrick inserta información no segura en el encabezado de respuesta, un atacante puede explotarlo para insertar un carácter newline para dividir un encabezado e inyectar contenido malicioso para engañar a los clientes. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00041.html https://hackerone.com/reports/331984 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/11/msg00025.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/12/msg00009.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00027.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00033.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/31 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/32 https://security • CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 1

Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows code injection if the first argument (aka the "command" argument) to Shell#[] or Shell#test in lib/shell.rb is untrusted data. An attacker can exploit this to call an arbitrary Ruby method. Ruby versiones hasta 2.4.7, versiones 2.5.x hasta 2.5.6 y versiones 2.6.x hasta 2.6.4, permite una inyección de código si el primer argumento (también conocido como el argumento "command") para Shell#[] o Shell#test en la biblioteca lib/shell.rb es un dato no seguro. Un atacante puede explotar esto para llamar a un método de Ruby arbitrario. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00041.html https://hackerone.com/reports/327512 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/11/msg00025.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/12/msg00009.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00027.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00033.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/31 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/32 https://security • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 3.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

ruby193 uses an insecure LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting. ruby193 usa una configuración de LD_LIBRARY_PATH no segura. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-1945 • CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere •

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

The WEBrick gem 1.4.2 for Ruby allows directory traversal if the attacker once had local access to create a symlink to a location outside of the web root directory. NOTE: The vendor states that this is analogous to Options FollowSymlinks in the Apache HTTP Server, and therefore it is "not a problem. ** EN DISPUTA ** La WEBrick gem versión 1.4.2 para Ruby permite salto de directorio si el atacante alguna vez tuvo acceso local para crear un enlace simbólico a una ubicación fuera del directorio web root. NOTA: El proveedor declara que esto es similar a las Opciones FollowSymlinks en el Servidor HTTP de Apache, y por lo tanto "no es un problema". • https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15835 • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in the OpenSSL library in Ruby before 2.3.8, 2.4.x before 2.4.5, 2.5.x before 2.5.2, and 2.6.x before 2.6.0-preview3. When two OpenSSL::X509::Name objects are compared using ==, depending on the ordering, non-equal objects may return true. When the first argument is one character longer than the second, or the second argument contains a character that is one less than a character in the same position of the first argument, the result of == will be true. This could be leveraged to create an illegitimate certificate that may be accepted as legitimate and then used in signing or encryption operations. Se ha descubierto un problema en la biblioteca OpenSSL en Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.3.8, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.5, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.2 y versiones 2.6.x anteriores a la 2.6.0-preview3. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042105 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3738 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1948 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2565 https://hackerone.com/reports/387250 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •