CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2020-25718
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-25718
A flaw was found in the way samba, as an Active Directory Domain Controller, is able to support an RODC (read-only domain controller). This would allow an RODC to print administrator tickets. Se encontró un fallo en la forma en que samba, como controlador de dominio de Active Directory, es capaz de soportar un RODC (controlador de dominio de sólo lectura). Esto permitiría a un RODC imprimir tickets de administrador • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019726 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25718.html • CWE-862: Missing Authorization •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2020-25721
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-25721
Kerberos acceptors need easy access to stable AD identifiers (eg objectSid). Samba as an AD DC now provides a way for Linux applications to obtain a reliable SID (and samAccountName) in issued tickets. Los aceptadores de Kerberos necesitan un acceso fácil a los identificadores estables de AD (por ejemplo, objectSid). Samba como un DC AD ahora proporciona una manera para que las aplicaciones de Linux para obtener un SID confiable (y samAccountName) en los boletos emitidos • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021728 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14725 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25721.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2020-25722
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-25722
Multiple flaws were found in the way samba AD DC implemented access and conformance checking of stored data. An attacker could use this flaw to cause total domain compromise. Se han encontrado múltiples fallos en la forma en que samba AD DC implementa el acceso y la comprobación de conformidad de los datos almacenados. Un atacante podría usar este fallo para causar un compromiso total del dominio • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019764 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25722.html • CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3738
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3738
In DCE/RPC it is possible to share the handles (cookies for resource state) between multiple connections via a mechanism called 'association groups'. These handles can reference connections to our sam.ldb database. However while the database was correctly shared, the user credentials state was only pointed at, and when one connection within that association group ended, the database would be left pointing at an invalid 'struct session_info'. The most likely outcome here is a crash, but it is possible that the use-after-free could instead allow different user state to be pointed at and this might allow more privileged access. En DCE/RPC es posible compartir los manejadores (cookies para el estado de los recursos) entre múltiples conexiones por medio de un mecanismo llamado "association groups". • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021726 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14468 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2021-3738.html • CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2021-23192 – samba: Subsequent DCE/RPC fragment injection vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23192
A flaw was found in the way samba implemented DCE/RPC. If a client to a Samba server sent a very large DCE/RPC request, and chose to fragment it, an attacker could replace later fragments with their own data, bypassing the signature requirements. Se ha encontrado un fallo en la forma en que samba implementa DCE/RPC. Si un cliente a un servidor Samba enviaba una petición DCE/RPC muy grande, y elegía fragmentarla, un atacante podía reemplazar los fragmentos posteriores con sus propios datos, omitiendo los requisitos de firma A flaw was found in the way samba implemented DCE/RPC. If a client to a Samba server sent a very large DCE/RPC request, and chose to fragment it, an attacker could replace later fragments with their own data, bypassing the signature requirements. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019666 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-23192 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2021-23192.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-23192 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •