Page 64 of 521 results (0.016 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

A possibly exploitable crash triggered during layout and manipulation of bidirectional unicode text in concert with CSS animations. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 52.1, Firefox ESR < 52.1, and Firefox < 53. Cierre inesperado posiblemente explotable desencadenado durante el diseño y manipulación de texto unicode bidireccional junto con animaciones CSS. La vulnerabilidad afecta a Thunderbird en versiones anteriores a la 52.1, Firefox ESR en versiones anteriores a la 52.1 y Firefox en versiones anteriores a la 53. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97940 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038320 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1104 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1106 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1201 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1340127 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2017-10 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2017-12 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2017-13 https://access.redhat.com/security/c • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 9.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in QEMU's Cirrus CLGD 54xx VGA emulator's VNC display driver support before 2.9; the issue could occur when a VNC client attempted to update its display after a VGA operation is performed by a guest. A privileged user/process inside a guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process or, potentially, execute arbitrary code on the host with privileges of the QEMU process. Se ha detectado una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica (heap) en el soporte del controlador de pantalla VNC del emulador Cirrus CLGD 54xx VGA de QEMU en versiones anteriores a la 2.9. El problema podía ocurrir cuando un cliente VNC intentaba actualizar su pantalla después de que un invitado realizara una operación VGA. Un usuario/proceso privilegiado dentro de un guest podría usar esta vulnerabilidad para provocar que el proceso de QEMU se cierre inesperadamente o, potencialmente, ejecutar código arbitrario en el host con privilegios del proceso de QEMU. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96893 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038023 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0980 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0981 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0982 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0983 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0984 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0985 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0987 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0988 https:& • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 87%CPEs: 174EXPL: 1

In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. En Apache Log4j 2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.8.2, cuando se utiliza el servidor de socket TCP o el servidor de socket UDP para recibir sucesos de registro serializados de otra aplicación, puede enviarse una carga binaria especialmente diseñada que, cuando se deserializa, puede ejecutar código arbitrario. It was found that when using remote logging with log4j socket server the log4j server would deserialize any log event received via TCP or UDP. An attacker could use this flaw to send a specially crafted log event that, during deserialization, would execute arbitrary code in the context of the logger application. • https://github.com/pimps/CVE-2017-5645 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97702 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040200 http://www.securit • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 10%CPEs: 47EXPL: 0

A query with a specific set of characteristics could cause a server using DNS64 to encounter an assertion failure and terminate. An attacker could deliberately construct a query, enabling denial-of-service against a server if it was configured to use the DNS64 feature and other preconditions were met. Affects BIND 9.8.0 -> 9.8.8-P1, 9.9.0 -> 9.9.9-P6, 9.9.10b1->9.9.10rc1, 9.10.0 -> 9.10.4-P6, 9.10.5b1->9.10.5rc1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.0-P3, 9.11.1b1->9.11.1rc1, 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.9.9-S8. Una consulta con un conjunto determinado de características podría provocar que un servidor que emplea DNS64 se encuentre con un fallo de aserción y termine. Un atacante podría construir deliberadamente una consulta, habilitando una denegación de servicio (DoS) contra un servidor si está configurado para emplear la característica DNS64 y se cumplen otras precondiciones. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00044.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97653 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038259 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1095 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1105 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbux03747en_us https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01465 https://security.gentoo. • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 22%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0

Mistaken assumptions about the ordering of records in the answer section of a response containing CNAME or DNAME resource records could lead to a situation in which named would exit with an assertion failure when processing a response in which records occurred in an unusual order. Affects BIND 9.9.9-P6, 9.9.10b1->9.9.10rc1, 9.10.4-P6, 9.10.5b1->9.10.5rc1, 9.11.0-P3, 9.11.1b1->9.11.1rc1, and 9.9.9-S8. Las asunciones equivocadas sobre el orden de los registros en la sección de respuesta de una respuesta que contiene registros de recursos CNAME o DNAME podría conducir a una situación en la que named se cerraría con un fallo de aserción al procesar una respuesta en la que los registros ocurrieron en un orden inusual. Afecta a BIND en versiones 9.9.9-P6, desde la versión 9.9.10b1 hasta la 9.9.10rc1, la versión 9.10.4-P6, desde la versión 9.10.5b1 hasta la 9.10.5rc1, la versión 9.11.0-P3, desde la versión 9.11.1b1 hasta la 9.11.1rc1 y en la versión 9.9.9-S8. A denial of service flaw was found in the way BIND handled a query response containing CNAME or DNAME resource records in an unusual order. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97651 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038258 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040195 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1095 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1105 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1582 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1583 https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01466 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201708-01 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180802-0002 https://www.debian.org& • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •