CVSS: 9.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-1706 – chromium-browser: sandbox escape in ppapi
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-1706
The PPAPI implementation in Google Chrome before 52.0.2743.82 does not validate the origin of IPC messages to the plugin broker process that should have come from the browser process, which allows remote attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via an unexpected message type, related to broker_process_dispatcher.cc, ppapi_plugin_process_host.cc, ppapi_thread.cc, and render_frame_message_filter.cc. La implementación PPAPI en Google Chrome en versiones anteriores a 52.0.2743.82 no valida el origen de los mensajes IPC para el plugin del proceso broker que debería haber llegado desde el proceso navegador, lo que permite a atacantes remotos eludir un mecanismo de protección sandbox a través de un tipo de mensaje inesperado, relacionado con broker_process_dispatcher.cc, ppapi_plugin_process_host.cc, ppapi_thread.cc y render_frame_message_filter.cc. • http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2016/07/stable-channel-update.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00020.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00028.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1485.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3637 http://www.securitytracker.com • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0CVE-2016-1443
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-1443
The virtual network stack on Cisco AMP Threat Grid Appliance devices before 2.1.1 allows remote attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism, and consequently obtain sensitive interprocess information or modify interprocess data, via a crafted malware sample. La pila de red virtual en dispositivos Cisco AMP Threat Grid Appliance en versiones anteriores a 2.1.1 permite a atacantes remotos eludir el mecanismo de protección sandbox y consecuentemente obtener información sensible de interprocesos o modificar datos de interprocesos, a través de una muestra de malware manipulada. • http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20160706-tg • CWE-254: 7PK - Security Features •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 23%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2016-3211 – Microsoft Internet Explorer PerformDoDragDrop Protected Mode Sandbox Escape Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3211
An attacker who has gained code execution within the Internet Explorer Protected Mode sandbox can leverage this method to place a malicious executable file in any location to which the user has write access. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036096 http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-16-366 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2016/ms16-063 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-1797 – Apple OS X fontd Sandbox Escape Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-1797
Apple Type Services (ATS) in Apple OS X before 10.11.5 allows attackers to bypass intended FontValidator sandbox-policy restrictions and execute arbitrary code in a privileged context via a crafted app. Apple Type Services (ATS) en Apple OS X en versiones anteriores a 10.11.5 permite a atacantes eludir las restricciones de política de sandbox destinadas a FontValidator y ejecutar código arbitrario en un contexto privilegiado a través de una app manipulada. ... Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the sandbox policy for the fontd process. ... An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code outside the context of the Safari sandbox. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/May/msg00004.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/90696 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035895 http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-16-360 https://support.apple.com/HT206567 • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 32EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0363 – JDK: insecure use of invoke method in CORBA component, incorrect CVE-2013-3009 fix
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0363
The com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) uses the invoke method of the java.lang.reflect.Method class in an AccessController doPrivileged block, which allows remote attackers to call setSecurityManager and bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors related to a Proxy object instance implementing the java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler interface. ... La clase com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate en IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 en versiones anteriores a SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 en versiones anteriores a SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40) y 8 en versiones anteriores a SR3 (8.0.3.0) utiliza el método de invocación de la clase java.lang.reflect.Method en un bloque AccessController doPrivileged, lo que permite a atacantes remotos llamar a setSecurityManager y eludir un mecanismo de protección sandbox a través de vectores relacionados con una instancia a un objeto Proxy implementando la interfaz java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00042.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00061.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •