Page 67 of 3085 results (0.030 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

GNU Emacs through 28.2 allows attackers to execute commands via shell metacharacters in the name of a source-code file, because lib-src/etags.c uses the system C library function in its implementation of the ctags program. For example, a victim may use the "ctags *" command (suggested in the ctags documentation) in a situation where the current working directory has contents that depend on untrusted input. GNU Emacs hasta la versión 28.2 permite a los atacantes ejecutar comandos a través de metacaracteres de shell en el nombre de un archivo de código fuente, porque lib-src/etags.c utiliza la función de librería C del sistema en su implementación del programa ctags. Por ejemplo, una víctima puede utilizar el comando "ctags *" (sugerido en la documentación de ctags) en una situación en la que el directorio de trabajo actual tiene contenidos que dependen de entradas que no son de confianza. A flaw was found in Etags, the Ctags implementation of Emacs. • https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=d48bb4874bc6cd3e69c7a15fc3c91cc141025c51 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00046.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FOSK3J7BBAEI4IITW2DRUKLQYUZYKH6Y https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GOXIH2FDEQJEAARE52C3GHTLGQFBYPIB https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5314 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-45939 https://bugzill • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 11EXPL: 1

qs before 6.10.3, as used in Express before 4.17.3 and other products, allows attackers to cause a Node process hang for an Express application because an __ proto__ key can be used. In many typical Express use cases, an unauthenticated remote attacker can place the attack payload in the query string of the URL that is used to visit the application, such as a[__proto__]=b&a[__proto__]&a[length]=100000000. The fix was backported to qs 6.9.7, 6.8.3, 6.7.3, 6.6.1, 6.5.3, 6.4.1, 6.3.3, and 6.2.4 (and therefore Express 4.17.3, which has "deps: qs@6.9.7" in its release description, is not vulnerable). qs anterior a 6.10.3, como se usa en Express anterior a 4.17.3 y otros productos, permite a los atacantes provocar que un proceso de Nodo se cuelgue para una aplicación Express porque se puede usar una clave __ proto__. En muchos casos de uso típicos de Express, un atacante remoto no autenticado puede colocar el payload del ataque en la cadena de consulta de la URL que se utiliza para visitar la aplicación, como a[__proto__]=b&a[__proto__]&a[length] =100000000. La solución se respaldó a qs 6.9.7, 6.8.3, 6.7.3, 6.6.1, 6.5.3, 6.4.1, 6.3.3 y 6.2.4 (y por lo tanto a Express 4.17.3, que tiene "deps : qs@6.9.7" en la descripción de su versión, no es vulnerable). • https://github.com/n8tz/CVE-2022-24999 https://github.com/expressjs/express/releases/tag/4.17.3 https://github.com/ljharb/qs/pull/428 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/01/msg00039.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230908-0005 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-24999 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150323 • CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1

pgjdbc is an open source postgresql JDBC Driver. In affected versions a prepared statement using either `PreparedStatement.setText(int, InputStream)` or `PreparedStatemet.setBytea(int, InputStream)` will create a temporary file if the InputStream is larger than 2k. This will create a temporary file which is readable by other users on Unix like systems, but not MacOS. On Unix like systems, the system's temporary directory is shared between all users on that system. Because of this, when files and directories are written into this directory they are, by default, readable by other users on that same system. • https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/commit/9008dc9aade6dbfe4efafcd6872ebc55f4699cf5 https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/security/advisories/GHSA-562r-vg33-8x8h https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00003.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/25TY2L3RMVNOC7VAHJEAO7PTT6M6JJAD https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240329-0003 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-41946 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153399 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-377: Insecure Temporary File CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

In libarchive before 3.6.2, the software does not check for an error after calling calloc function that can return with a NULL pointer if the function fails, which leads to a resultant NULL pointer dereference. NOTE: the discoverer cites this CWE-476 remark but third parties dispute the code-execution impact: "In rare circumstances, when NULL is equivalent to the 0x0 memory address and privileged code can access it, then writing or reading memory is possible, which may lead to code execution." En libarchive anterior a 3.6.2, el software no busca un error después de llamar a la función calloc que puede regresar con un puntero NULL si la función falla, lo que conduce a una desreferencia del puntero NULL resultante. NOTA: el descubridor cita este comentario CWE-476, pero terceros cuestionan el impacto de la ejecución del código: "En raras circunstancias, cuando NULL es equivalente a la dirección de memoria 0x0 y el código privilegiado puede acceder a ella, entonces es posible escribir o leer la memoria, lo cual puede llevar a la ejecución del código." A flaw was found in libarchive. • https://bugs.gentoo.org/882521 https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/blob/v3.0.0a/libarchive/archive_write.c#L215 https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/issues/1754 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/01/msg00034.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/V67OO2UUQAUJS3IK4JZPF6F3LUCBU6IS https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-14 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-36227 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi&# • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

In Linaro Automated Validation Architecture (LAVA) before 2022.11, users with valid credentials can submit crafted XMLRPC requests that cause a recursive XML entity expansion, leading to excessive use of memory on the server and a Denial of Service. En Linaro Automated Validation Architecture (LAVA) anterior a 2022.11, los usuarios con credenciales válidas pueden enviar solicitudes XMLRPC manipuladas que provocan una expansión recursiva de la entidad XML, lo que provoca un uso excesivo de la memoria en el servidor y una Denegación de Servicio (DoS). • https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/01/msg00016.html https://lists.lavasoftware.org/archives/list/lava-announce%40lists.lavasoftware.org/thread/WHXGQMIZAPW3GCQEXYHC32N2ZAAAIYCY https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5318 • CWE-776: Improper Restriction of Recursive Entity References in DTDs ('XML Entity Expansion') •