CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 49EXPL: 2CVE-2016-2776 – ISC BIND 9 - Denial of Service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2776
buffer.c in named in ISC BIND 9 before 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P3, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0rc3 does not properly construct responses, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a crafted query. buffer.c en named en ISC BIND 9 en versiones anteriores a 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x en versiones anteriores a 9.10.4-P3 y 9.11.x en versiones anteriores a 9.11.0rc3 no construye respuestas adecuadamente, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (fallo de aserción y salida de demonio) a través de una consulta manipulada. A denial of service flaw was found in the way BIND constructed a response to a query that met certain criteria. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make named exit unexpectedly with an assertion failure via a specially crafted DNS request packet. A defect in the rendering of messages into packets can cause named to exit with an assertion failure in buffer.c while constructing a response to a query that meets certain criteria. This assertion can be triggered even if the apparent source address isnt allowed to make queries. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40453 https://github.com/infobyte/CVE-2016-2776 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1944.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1945.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2099.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinoct2016-3090566.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.html http://www.securityf • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 29%CPEs: 34EXPL: 0CVE-2016-6302 – openssl: Insufficient TLS session ticket HMAC length checks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-6302
The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not consider the HMAC size during validation of the ticket length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ticket that is too short. La función tls_decrypt_ticket en ssl/t1_lib.c en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 1.1.0 no considera el tamaño HMAC durante la validación de la longitud del ticket, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio a través de un ticket que es muy corto. An integer underflow flaw leading to a buffer over-read was found in the way OpenSSL parsed TLS session tickets. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash a TLS server using OpenSSL if it used SHA-512 as HMAC for session tickets. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1940.html http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5687
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5687
The VerticalFilter function in the DDS coder in ImageMagick before 6.9.4-3 and 7.x before 7.0.1-4 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted DDS file, which triggers an out-of-bounds read. La función VerticalFilter en el codificacor DDS en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.4-3 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-4 permite a atacantes remotos tener un impacto no especificado a través de un archvio DDS manipulado, lo que desencadena una lectura fuera de límites. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/14/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/17/3 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91283 https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/46-Various-invalid-memory-reads-in-ImageMagick-WPG%2C-DDS%2C-DCM.html • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 12%CPEs: 3EXPL: 1CVE-2016-5841
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5841
Integer overflow in MagickCore/profile.c in ImageMagick before 7.0.2-1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) or possibly execute arbitrary code via vectors involving the offset variable. Desbordamiento de entero en MagickCore/profile.c en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 7.0.2-1 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (fallo de segmentación) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de vectores que implican a la variable offset. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/23/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/25/3 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91394 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/d8ab7f046587f2e9f734b687ba7e6e10147c294b https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commits/7.0.2-1 • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 1%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5688
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5688
The WPG parser in ImageMagick before 6.9.4-4 and 7.x before 7.0.1-5, when a memory limit is set, allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors related to the SetImageExtent return-value check, which trigger (1) a heap-based buffer overflow in the SetPixelIndex function or an invalid write operation in the (2) ScaleCharToQuantum or (3) SetPixelIndex functions. El analizador WPG en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.4-4 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-5, cuando se establece un límite de memoria, permite a atacantes remotos tener un impacto no especificado a través de vectores relacionados con la comprobación del valor de retorno SetImageExtent, lo que desencadena (1) un desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica en la función SetPixelIndex o una operación de escritura no válida en las funciones (2) ScaleCharToQuantum o (3) SetPixelIndex. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/14/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/17/3 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91283 https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/46-Various-invalid-memory-reads-in-ImageMagick-WPG%2C-DDS%2C-DCM.html https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/aecd0ada163a4d6c769cec178955d5f3e9316f2f https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/fc43974d34318c834fbf78570ca1a3764ed8c7d7 https • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •