CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 1%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2005-4826
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-4826
Unspecified vulnerability in the VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP) feature in Cisco IOS 12.1(22)EA3 on Catalyst 2950T switches allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reboot) via a crafted Subset-Advert message packet, a different issue than CVE-2006-4774, CVE-2006-4775, and CVE-2006-4776. • http://osvdb.org/33013 http://secunia.com/advisories/23892 http://securitytracker.com/id?1017568 http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-europe-05/bh-eu-05-speakers.html#Berrueta http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a00807d1a81.html http://www.s21sec.com/en/avisos/s21sec-034-en.txt http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/458240/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/458554/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22268 http:/& •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 167EXPL: 1CVE-2005-4258
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-4258
Unspecified Cisco Catalyst Switches allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash) via an IP packet with the same source and destination IPs and ports, and with the SYN flag set (aka LanD). NOTE: the provenance of this issue is unknown; the details are obtained solely from the BID. Conmutadores Cisco Catalyst no especificados permiten a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída de dispositivo) mediante un paquete IP con IPs y puertos de origen y destino iguales y con la bandera SYN. (tcc LanD). NOTA: La proveniencia de esta cuestión es desconocida; los detalles son obtenidos exclusivamente de BID. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15864 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/44543 •
CVSS: 2.6EPSS: 5%CPEs: 225EXPL: 2CVE-2005-3921
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-3921
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco IOS Web Server for IOS 12.0(2a) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by (1) packets containing HTML that an administrator views via an HTTP interface to the contents of memory buffers, as demonstrated by the URI /level/15/exec/-/buffers/assigned/dump; or (2) sending the router Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) packets with HTML payload that an administrator views via the CDP status pages. NOTE: these vectors were originally reported as being associated with the dump and packet options in /level/15/exec/-/show/buffers. • http://secunia.com/advisories/17780 http://secunia.com/advisories/18528 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/227 http://securitytracker.com/id?1015275 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20051201-http.shtml http://www.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=372 http://www.infohacking.com/INFOHACKING_RESEARCH/Our_Advisories/cisco/index.html http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/417916/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15602 http://www.securit •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 6%CPEs: 138EXPL: 0CVE-2005-3669
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-3669
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) implementation in multiple Cisco products allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reset) via certain malformed IKE packets, as demonstrated by the PROTOS ISAKMP Test Suite for IKEv1. NOTE: due to the lack of details in the Cisco advisory, it is unclear which of CVE-2005-3666, CVE-2005-3667, and/or CVE-2005-3668 this issue applies to. • http://jvn.jp/niscc/NISCC-273756/index.html http://secunia.com/advisories/17553 http://securitytracker.com/id?1015198 http://securitytracker.com/id?1015199 http://securitytracker.com/id?1015200 http://securitytracker.com/id?1015201 http://securitytracker.com/id? •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 5%CPEs: 228EXPL: 0CVE-2005-3481
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-3481
Cisco IOS 12.0 to 12.4 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a heap-based buffer overflow in system timers. NOTE: this issue does not correspond to a specific vulnerability, rather a general weakness that only increases the feasibility of exploitation of any vulnerabilities that might exist. Such design-level weaknesses normally are not included in CVE, so perhaps this issue should be REJECTed. • http://secunia.com/advisories/17413 http://securitytracker.com/id?1015139 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20051102-timers.shtml http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/562945 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15275 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/2282 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A4914 •