CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 2CVE-2018-1124 – Procps-ng - Multiple Vulnerabilities
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1124
procps-ng before version 3.3.15 is vulnerable to multiple integer overflows leading to a heap corruption in file2strvec function. This allows a privilege escalation for a local attacker who can create entries in procfs by starting processes, which could result in crashes or arbitrary code execution in proc utilities run by other users. procps-ng en versiones anteriores a la 3.3.15 es vulnerable a múltiples desbordamientos de enteros que conducen a una corrupción de la memoria dinámica (heap) en la función file2strvec. Esto permite el escalado de privilegios para un atacante local que puede crear entradas en procfs empezando procesos, lo que podría resultar en cierres inesperados o la ejecución de código arbitrario en las utilidades proc ejecutadas por otros usuarios. Multiple integer overflows leading to heap corruption flaws were discovered in file2strvec(). These vulnerabilities can lead to privilege escalation for a local attacker who can create entries in procfs by starting processes, which will lead to crashes or arbitrary code execution in proc utilities run by other users (eg pgrep, pkill, pidof, w). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44806 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00059.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q2/122 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104214 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041057 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1700 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1777 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1820 https://access.redha • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5CVE-2018-3639 – AMD / ARM / Intel - Speculative Execution Variant 4 Speculative Store Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3639
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 1CVE-2018-11212 – libjpeg-turbo: Divide By Zero in alloc_sarray function in jmemmgr.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-11212
An issue was discovered in libjpeg 9a and 9d. The alloc_sarray function in jmemmgr.c allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero error) via a crafted file. Se ha descubierto un problema en libjpeg 9a y 9d. La función alloc_sarray en jmemmgr.c permite que los atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (error de división entre cero) mediante un archivo manipulado. A divide by zero vulnerability has been discovered in libjpeg-turbo in alloc_sarray function of jmemmgr.c file. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00013.html http://www.ijg.org http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106583 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0469 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0472 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0473 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0474 https:/ • CWE-369: Divide By Zero •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2018-6120 – chromium-browser: Heap buffer overflow in PDFium
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-6120
An integer overflow that could lead to an attacker-controlled heap out-of-bounds write in PDFium in Google Chrome prior to 66.0.3359.170 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted PDF file. Un desbordamiento de enteros que conduce a una escritura fuera de límites basada en memoria dinámica (heap) controlada por el atacante en PDFium en Google Chrome en versiones anteriores a la 66.0.3359.170 permitía que un atacante remoto ejecutase código arbitrario dentro de un sandbox mediante un archivo PDF manipulado. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104143 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1446 https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2018/05/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html https://crbug.com/833721 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201805-06 https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4237 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-6120 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577115 • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.9EPSS: 97%CPEs: 22EXPL: 4CVE-2018-1111 – DynoRoot DHCP Client - Command Injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1111
DHCP packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7, Fedora 28, and earlier are vulnerable to a command injection flaw in the NetworkManager integration script included in the DHCP client. A malicious DHCP server, or an attacker on the local network able to spoof DHCP responses, could use this flaw to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on systems using NetworkManager and configured to obtain network configuration using the DHCP protocol. Los paquetes DHCP en Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 y 7, Fedora 28 y anteriores son vulnerables a un error de inyección de comandos en el script de integración NetworkManager incluido en el cliente DHCP. Un servidor DHCP malicioso o un atacante en la red ocal capaz de suplantar respuestas DHCP podría emplear este error para ejecutar comandos arbitrarios con privilegios root en sistemas que emplean NetworkManager y se configuran para obtener la configuración de red mediante el protocolo de configuración dinámica de host (DHCP). A command injection flaw was found in the NetworkManager integration script included in the DHCP client packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44652 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44890 https://github.com/kkirsche/CVE-2018-1111 https://github.com/knqyf263/CVE-2018-1111 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104195 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040912 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1453 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1456 https://access.redhat.com&#x • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •