Page 7 of 1393 results (0.014 seconds)

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 96%CPEs: 398EXPL: 30

Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. • https://github.com/fullhunt/log4j-scan https://github.com/Puliczek/CVE-2021-44228-PoC-log4j-bypass-words https://github.com/cyberstruggle/L4sh https://github.com/woodpecker-appstore/log4j-payload-generator https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/apache-log4j-poc https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51183 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50592 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50590 https://github.com/logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner https://github.com/jas502n/Log4j2-CVE-2021-44228 h • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0

In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. En Django versiones 2.2 anteriores a 2.2.25, versiones 3.1 anteriores a 3.1.14, y versiones 3.2 anteriores a 3.2.10, las peticiones HTTP para URLs con líneas nuevas al final podían omitir el control de acceso de la corriente principal basado en las rutas de las URLs • https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/B4SQG2EAF4WCI2SLRL6XRDJ3RPK3ZRDV https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211229-0006 https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/07/1 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-44420 https://bugzilla.redhat • CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0

In ImfChromaticities.cpp routine RGBtoXYZ(), there are some division operations such as `float Z = (1 - chroma.white.x - chroma.white.y) * Y / chroma.white.y;` and `chroma.green.y * (X + Z))) / d;` but the divisor is not checked for a 0 value. A specially crafted file could trigger a divide-by-zero condition which could affect the availability of programs linked with OpenEXR. En la rutina RGBtoXYZ() del archivo ImfChromaticities.cpp, se presentan algunas operaciones de división como "float Z = (1 - chroma.white.x - chroma.white.y) * Y / chroma.white.y;" y "chroma.green.y * (X + Z)) / d;" pero no es comprobado que el divisor tenga un valor 0. Un archivo especialmente diseñado podría desencadenar una condición de división por cero que podría afectar a la disponibilidad de los programas enlazados con OpenEXR • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019789 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00022.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I2JSMJ7HLWFPYYV7IAQZD5ZUUUN7RWBN https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-31 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5299 • CWE-369: Divide By Zero •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

A vulnerability has been identified in Desigo CC (All versions with OIS Extension Module), GMA-Manager (All versions with OIS running on Debian 9 or earlier), Operation Scheduler (All versions with OIS running on Debian 9 or earlier), Siveillance Control (All versions with OIS running on Debian 9 or earlier), Siveillance Control Pro (All versions). The affected application incorrectly neutralizes special elements in a specific HTTP GET request which could lead to command injection. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system with root privileges. Se ha identificado una vulnerabilidad en Desigo CC (Todas las versiones con módulo de extensión OIS), GMA-Manager (Todas las versiones con OIS que se ejecutan en Debian 9 o anterior), Operation Scheduler (Todas las versiones con OIS que se ejecutan en Debian 9 o anterior), Siveillance Control (Todas las versiones con OIS que se ejecutan en Debian 9 o anterior), Siveillance Control Pro (Todas las versiones). La aplicación afectada neutraliza incorrectamente elementos especiales en una petición HTTP GET específica que podría conllevar a una inyección de comandos. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-535380.pdf • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0

An infinite loop flaw was found in the e1000 NIC emulator of the QEMU. This issue occurs while processing transmits (tx) descriptors in process_tx_desc if various descriptor fields are initialized with invalid values. This flaw allows a guest to consume CPU cycles on the host, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se ha encontrado un fallo de bucle infinito en el emulador NIC e1000 de QEMU. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930087 https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/3de46e6fc489c52c9431a8a832ad8170a7569bd8 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/09/msg00008.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-02/msg07428.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-27 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220425-0003 https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/25/2 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-20257 • CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •