Page 7 of 47 results (0.011 seconds)

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 94%CPEs: 238EXPL: 0

Off-by-one error in named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.7.3-P1, 9.8.x before 9.8.0-P2, 9.4-ESV before 9.4-ESV-R4-P1, and 9.6-ESV before 9.6-ESV-R4-P1 allows remote DNS servers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a negative response containing large RRSIG RRsets. Error de superación de límite (off-by-one) en named de ISC BIND 9.x anteriores a 9.7.3-P1, 9.8.x anteriores a 9.8.0-P2, 9.4-ESV anteriores a 9.4-ESV-R4-P1, y 9.6-ESV anteriores a 9.6-ESV-R4-P1 permite a servidores remotos DNS provocar una denegación de servicio (fallo de aserción y finalización del demonio) a través de una respuesta negativa que contenga RRSIG RRsets de gran tamaño. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/Security-announce/2011//Oct/msg00003.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-June/061082.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-June/061401.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-June/061405.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142180687100892&w=2 http://osvdb.org/72540 http://secunia.com/advisories/44677 http://secunia.com/advisories/44719 http://secunia.com/advisories/447 • CWE-189: Numeric Errors •

CVSS: 6.4EPSS: 2%CPEs: 236EXPL: 0

named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.6.2-P3, 9.7.x before 9.7.2-P3, 9.4-ESV before 9.4-ESV-R4, and 9.6-ESV before 9.6-ESV-R3 does not properly determine the security status of an NS RRset during a DNSKEY algorithm rollover, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (DNSSEC validation error) by triggering a rollover. named en ISC BIND 9.x anteriores a 9.6.2-P3, 9.7.x anteriores a 9.7.2-P3, 9.4-ESV anteriores a 9.4-ESV-R4, y 9.6-ESV anteriores a 9.6-ESV-R3 no determina apropiadamente el status de seguridad de un NS RRset durante una renegociación ("rollover") del algoritmo DNSKEY. Lo que puede permitir a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (error de validación DNSSEC) provocando un renegociación. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/Security-announce/2011//Oct/msg00003.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-December/051910.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-December/051963.html http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2011/000126.html http://secunia.com/advisories/42435 http://secunia.com/advisories/42459 http://secunia.com/advisories/42522 http://secunia.com/advisories/42671 http://securitytracker.com/id?1024817 http:/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 7%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

ISC BIND before 9.7.2-P2, when DNSSEC validation is enabled, does not properly handle certain bad signatures if multiple trust anchors exist for a single zone, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a DNS query. ISC BIND antes de su versión v9.7.2-P2, cuando la validación DNSSEC está habilitada, no controla correctamente ciertas firmas incorrectas si existen múltiples puntos confianza para una sola zona, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (bloqueo del demonio) a través de una consulta DNS. • http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.2-P2/RELEASE-NOTES-BIND-9.7.2-P2.html http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2011/000126.html http://support.avaya.com/css/P8/documents/100124923 http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2130 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:253 http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0976.html http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/516909/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45385 http:/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 7.6EPSS: 4%CPEs: 168EXPL: 0

ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta handles out-of-bailiwick data accompanying a secure response without re-fetching from the original source, which allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via a crafted response, aka Bug 20819. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of a regression during the fix for CVE-2009-4022. ISC BIND 9.0.x a 9.3.x, 9.4 en versiones anteriores a la 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 en versiones anteriores a la 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 en versiones anteriores a la 9.6.1-P3, y 9.7.0 beta maneja de manera inapropiada los datos de acompañamiento de una respuesta segura sin volver a consultar a la fuente original, lo que permite a atacantes remotos tener un impacto no especificado mediante una respuesta manipulada, también conocido como Bug 20819. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una regresión durante la solución de CVE-2009-4022. • http://secunia.com/advisories/40086 http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2010-0018 http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2054 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0622 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1352 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11753 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6665 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 189EXPL: 0

ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain. ISC BIND 9.0.x a 9.3.x, 9.4 en versiones anteriores a la 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 en versiones anteriores a la 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 en versiones anteriores a la 9.6.1-P3, y9.7.0 beta, no valida de manera apropiada los registros DNSSEC (1) NSEC y (2) NSEC3, lo que permite a atacantes remotos añadir el flag (bandera) Authenticated Data (AD) a una respuesta NXDOMAIN falsificada para un dominio existente. • ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/unixware7/714/security/p535243_uw7/p535243b.txt http://lists.apple.com/archives/Security-announce/2011//Oct/msg00003.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-January/034196.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-January/034202.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-01/msg00009.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127195582210247&w=2 http://secunia.com/advisories/38169 http://secunia.com/adv • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •