CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 12%CPEs: 26EXPL: 1CVE-2014-3570 – openssl: Bignum squaring may produce incorrect results
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3570
The BN_sqr implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k does not properly calculate the square of a BIGNUM value, which might make it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via unspecified vectors, related to crypto/bn/asm/mips.pl, crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-gcc.c, and crypto/bn/bn_asm.c. La implementación BN_sqr en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0p, y 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1k no calcula correctamente el cuadrado de un valor BIGNUM, lo que podría facilitar a atacantes remotos superar los mecanismos de protección criptográficos a través de vectores no especificados, relacionado con crypto/bn/asm/mips.pl, crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-gcc.c, y crypto/bn/bn_asm.c. It was found that OpenSSL's BigNumber Squaring implementation could produce incorrect results under certain special conditions. This flaw could possibly affect certain OpenSSL library functionality, such as RSA blinding. Note that this issue occurred rarely and with a low probability, and there is currently no known way of exploiting it. • https://github.com/uthrasri/CVE-2014-3570 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10679 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Apr/msg00001.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/147938.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148363.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-01/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html http://lis • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 65%CPEs: 26EXPL: 0CVE-2014-3571 – openssl: DTLS segmentation fault in dtls1_get_record
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3571
OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted DTLS message that is processed with a different read operation for the handshake header than for the handshake body, related to the dtls1_get_record function in d1_pkt.c and the ssl3_read_n function in s3_pkt.c. OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0p, y 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1k permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (referencia a puntero nulo y caída de la aplicación) a través de un mensaje DTLS manipulado que se procesa con un operación diferente de lectura para la cabecera de negociación que la del cuerpo de la negociación, relacionado con la función dtls1_get_record en d1_pkt.c y la función ssl3_read_n en s3_pkt.c. A NULL pointer dereference flaw was found in the DTLS implementation of OpenSSL. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted DTLS message, which would cause an OpenSSL server to crash. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Apr/msg00001.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/147938.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148363.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-01/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142496179803395&w •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 26EXPL: 0CVE-2014-3572 – openssl: ECDH downgrade bug fix
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3572
The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote SSL servers to conduct ECDHE-to-ECDH downgrade attacks and trigger a loss of forward secrecy by omitting the ServerKeyExchange message. La función ssl3_get_key_exchange function en s3_clnt.c en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.0p y 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1k permite a servidores SSL remotos llevar a cabo ataques de desactualización ECDHE-to-ECDH y desencadenar una pérdida de confidencialidad directa omitiendo los mensajes ServerKeyExchange. It was discovered that OpenSSL would perform an ECDH key exchange with a non-ephemeral key even when the ephemeral ECDH cipher suite was selected. A malicious server could make a TLS/SSL client using OpenSSL use a weaker key exchange method than the one requested by the user. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10679 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Apr/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-01/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00037.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.h • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 12%CPEs: 26EXPL: 0CVE-2014-8275 – openssl: Fix various certificate fingerprint issues
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-8275
OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k does not enforce certain constraints on certificate data, which allows remote attackers to defeat a fingerprint-based certificate-blacklist protection mechanism by including crafted data within a certificate's unsigned portion, related to crypto/asn1/a_verify.c, crypto/dsa/dsa_asn1.c, crypto/ecdsa/ecs_vrf.c, and crypto/x509/x_all.c. OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0p, y 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1k no fuerza ciertas limitaciones sobre datos de certificados, lo que permite a atacantes remotos derrotar un mecanismo de protección de lista negra de certificados basado en huellas dactilares mediante la inclusión de datos manipulados dentro de la porción no firmada de un certificado, relacionado con crypto/asn1/a_verify.c, crypto/dsa/dsa_asn1.c, crypto/ecdsa/ecs_vrf.c, y crypto/x509/x_all.c. Multiple flaws were found in the way OpenSSL parsed X.509 certificates. An attacker could use these flaws to modify an X.509 certificate to produce a certificate with a different fingerprint without invalidating its signature, and possibly bypass fingerprint-based blacklisting in applications. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10679 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Apr/msg00001.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148363.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-01/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 90%CPEs: 34EXPL: 0CVE-2014-3567 – openssl: Invalid TLS/SSL session tickets could cause memory leak leading to server crash
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3567
Memory leak in the tls_decrypt_ticket function in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zc, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0o, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1j allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted session ticket that triggers an integrity-check failure. Fuga de memoria en la función tls_decrypt_ticket en t1_lib.c en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8zc, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0o, y 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1j permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (consumo de memoria) a través de un ticket de sesión manipulado que provoca un fallo en la comprobación de integridad. A memory leak flaw was found in the way an OpenSSL handled failed session ticket integrity checks. A remote attacker could exhaust all available memory of an SSL/TLS or DTLS server by sending a large number of invalid session tickets to that server. • ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2014-015.txt.asc http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0416.html http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory11.asc http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Jan/msg00003.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2014-10/msg00008.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2014-11/msg00001.html http& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-399: Resource Management Errors CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •