CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 3%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1543 – ChaCha20-Poly1305 with long nonces
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1543
ChaCha20-Poly1305 is an AEAD cipher, and requires a unique nonce input for every encryption operation. RFC 7539 specifies that the nonce value (IV) should be 96 bits (12 bytes). OpenSSL allows a variable nonce length and front pads the nonce with 0 bytes if it is less than 12 bytes. However it also incorrectly allows a nonce to be set of up to 16 bytes. In this case only the last 12 bytes are significant and any additional leading bytes are ignored. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00056.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3700 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=ee22257b1418438ebaf54df98af4e24f494d1809 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f426625b6ae9a7831010750490a5f0ad689c5ba3 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Y3IVFGSERAZLNJCK35TEM2R4726XIH3Z https://lis • CWE-323: Reusing a Nonce, Key Pair in Encryption CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2018-16395 – ruby: OpenSSL::X509:: Name equality check does not work correctly
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16395
An issue was discovered in the OpenSSL library in Ruby before 2.3.8, 2.4.x before 2.4.5, 2.5.x before 2.5.2, and 2.6.x before 2.6.0-preview3. When two OpenSSL::X509::Name objects are compared using ==, depending on the ordering, non-equal objects may return true. When the first argument is one character longer than the second, or the second argument contains a character that is one less than a character in the same position of the first argument, the result of == will be true. This could be leveraged to create an illegitimate certificate that may be accepted as legitimate and then used in signing or encryption operations. Se ha descubierto un problema en la biblioteca OpenSSL en Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.3.8, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.5, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.2 y versiones 2.6.x anteriores a la 2.6.0-preview3. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042105 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3738 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1948 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2565 https://hackerone.com/reports/387250 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2018-0734 – Timing attack against DSA
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-0734
The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00030.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00056.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105758 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2304 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3700 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3932 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3933 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3935 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-385: Covert Timing Channel •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 47EXPL: 0CVE-2018-0735 – Timing attack against ECDSA signature generation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-0735
The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Se ha demostrado que el algoritmo de firmas ECDSA en OpenSSL es vulnerable a un ataque de sincronización de canal lateral. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105750 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041986 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3700 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=56fb454d281a023b3f950d969693553d3f3ceea1 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=b1d6d55ece1c26fa2829e2b819b038d7b6d692b4 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00024.html https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/november-2018-security-releases https://security.netapp.com/advisor • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-385: Covert Timing Channel •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 1CVE-2016-7798
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-7798
The openssl gem for Ruby uses the same initialization vector (IV) in GCM Mode (aes-*-gcm) when the IV is set before the key, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to bypass the encryption protection mechanism. La openssl gem para Ruby utiliza el mismo vector de inicialización (IV) en el modo GCM (aes - * - gcm) cuando el IV se establece en versiones anteriores a la clave, lo que facilita que los atacantes dependiendo del contexto eludan el mecanismo de protección del cifrado. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/19/9 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/30/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/01/2 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93031 https://github.com/ruby/openssl/commit/8108e0a6db133f3375608303fdd2083eb5115062 https://github.com/ruby/openssl/issues/49 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/07/msg00012.html https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3966 • CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength •