Page 7 of 37 results (0.015 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 0

Perl might allow context-dependent attackers to bypass the taint protection mechanism in a child process via duplicate environment variables in envp. Perl podría permitir a atacantes dependientes de contexto eludir los mecanismos de protección taint en un proceso hijo a través de variables de entorno duplicadas en envp. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-03/msg00112.html http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/ae37b791a73a9e78dedb89fb2429d2628cf58076 http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3501 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/326387 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html http://www.securityfocus.com/b • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 97%CPEs: 68EXPL: 10

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the (1) send_dg and (2) send_vc functions in the libresolv library in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted DNS response that triggers a call to the getaddrinfo function with the AF_UNSPEC or AF_INET6 address family, related to performing "dual A/AAAA DNS queries" and the libnss_dns.so.2 NSS module. Múltiples desbordamientos de buffer basado en pila en las funciones (1) send_dg y (2) send_vc en la librería libresolv en la librería GNU C (también conocida como glibc o libc6) en versiones anteriores a 2.23 permiten a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una respuesta DNS manipulada que desencadenan una llamada a la función getaddrinfo con la familia de direcciones AF_UNSPEC o AF_INET6, en relación con la ejecución de "consultas duales A/AAAA DNS" y el módulo libnss_dns.so.2 NSS. A stack-based buffer overflow was found in the way the libresolv library performed dual A/AAAA DNS queries. A remote attacker could create a specially crafted DNS response which could cause libresolv to crash or, potentially, execute code with the permissions of the user running the library. Note: this issue is only exposed when libresolv is called from the nss_dns NSS service module. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39454 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40339 https://github.com/fjserna/CVE-2015-7547 https://github.com/cakuzo/CVE-2015-7547 https://github.com/Stick-U235/CVE-2015-7547-Research https://github.com/t0r0t0r0/CVE-2015-7547 https://github.com/babykillerblack/CVE-2015-7547 https://github.com/Amilaperera12/Glibc-Vulnerability-Exploit-CVE-2015-7547 https://github.com/miracle03/CVE-2015-7547-master https://github.com/bluebluelan/CVE-2015-7547&# • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0

The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e mishandles errors caused by malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by triggering a decoding failure in a PKCS#7 or CMS application. La implementación ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE en crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1q y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2e no maneja correctamente los errores provocados por datos X509_ATTRIBUTE malformados, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible de memoria de proceso desencadenando un fallo de decodificación en una aplicación PKCS#7 o CMS. A memory leak vulnerability was found in the way OpenSSL parsed PKCS#7 and CMS data. A remote attacker could use this flaw to cause an application that parses PKCS#7 or CMS data from untrusted sources to use an excessive amount of memory and possibly crash. • http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-advisory-december-2015 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10733 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10761 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/173801.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

The Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.51 does not validate a point is withing the elliptic curve, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private keys via a series of crafted elliptic curve Diffie Hellman (ECDH) key exchanges, aka an "invalid curve attack." La librería Bouncy Castle Java en versiones anteriores a 1.51 no valida un punto que se encuentra dentro de la curva elíptica, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos obtener claves privadas a través de una serie de intercambios de clave de curva elíptica Diffie Hellman (ECDH) manipulados, también conocida como un 'ataque de curva no válida'. It was found that bouncycastle is vulnerable to an invalid curve attack. An attacker could extract private keys used in elliptic curve cryptography with a few thousand queries. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/174915.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-11/msg00012.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2035.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2036.html http://web-in-security.blogspot.ca/2015/09/practical-invalid-curve-attacks.html http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3417 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/22/7 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-358: Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 160EXPL: 0

The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue. El algoritmo RC4, utilizado en el protocolo TLS y el protocolo SSL, no combina correctamente los datos de estados con los datos de claves durante la fase de inicialización, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos realizar ataques de recuperación de texto claro contra los bytes iniciales de un flujo mediante la captura de trafico de la red que ocasionalmente depende de claves afectadas por la debilidad de la invariabilidad (Invariance Weakness), y posteriormente utilizar un acercamiento de fuerza bruta que involucra valores LSB, también conocido como el problema de 'Bar Mitzvah'. • http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04779034 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •