Page 7 of 56 results (0.006 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 91%CPEs: 54EXPL: 0

An h2c direct connection to Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M5 to 9.0.36 and 8.5.1 to 8.5.56 did not release the HTTP/1.1 processor after the upgrade to HTTP/2. If a sufficient number of such requests were made, an OutOfMemoryException could occur leading to a denial of service. Una conexión directa h2c a Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.0-M6, versiones 9.0.0.M5 hasta 9.0.36 y versiones 8.5.1 hasta 8.5.56, no publicó el procesador HTTP/1.1 después de la actualización a HTTP/2. Si un número suficiente de tales peticiones fueron hechas, podría ocurrir una OutOfMemoryException conllevando a una denegación de servicio A flaw was found in Apache Tomcat, where an h2c direct connection did not release the HTTP/1.1 processor after the upgrade to HTTP/2. If a sufficient number of such requests are made, an OutOfMemoryException could occur, leading to a denial of service. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00084.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00088.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61f411cf82488d6ec213063fc15feeeb88e31b0ca9c29652ee4f962e%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra072b1f786e7d139e86f1d1145572e0ff71cef38a96d9c6f5362aac8%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/07/msg00017.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200724-0003 https://usn • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 46EXPL: 1

A specially crafted sequence of HTTP/2 requests sent to Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M5, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.35 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.55 could trigger high CPU usage for several seconds. If a sufficient number of such requests were made on concurrent HTTP/2 connections, the server could become unresponsive. Una secuencia especialmente diseñada de peticiones HTTP/2 enviadas a Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.0-M5, versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.35 y versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.55, podría desencadenar un uso elevado de la CPU por varios segundos. Si se hacen una cantidad suficiente de tales peticiones en conexiones HTTP/2 concurrentes, el servidor podría dejar de responder • https://github.com/rusakovichma/tomcat-embed-core-9.0.31-CVE-2020-11996 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00064.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00072.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2529016c311ce9485e6f173446d469600fdfbb94dccadfcd9dfdac79%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3ea96d8f36dd404acce83df8aeb22a9e807d6c13ca9c5dec72f872cd%40%3Cnotifications.ofbiz.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5541ef6b6b68b49f76fc4c45695940116da2b • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 91%CPEs: 77EXPL: 12

When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. Cuando se usa Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.34, 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.54 y 7.0.0 hasta 7.0. 103, si a) un atacante es capaz de controlar el contenido y el nombre de un archivo en el servidor; y b) el servidor está configurado para usar el PersistenceManager con un FileStore; y c) el PersistenceManager está configurado con sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (el valor predeterminado a menos que se utilice un SecurityManager) o un filtro lo suficientemente laxo como para permitir que el objeto proporcionado por el atacante sea deserializado; y d) el atacante conoce la ruta relativa del archivo desde la ubicación de almacenamiento usada por FileStore hasta el archivo sobre el que el atacante presenta control; entonces, mediante una petición específicamente diseñada, el atacante podrá ser capaz de desencadenar una ejecución de código remota mediante la deserialización del archivo bajo su control. Tome en cuenta que todas las condiciones desde la a) hasta la d) deben cumplirse para que el ataque tenga éxito. A deserialization flaw was discovered in Apache Tomcat's use of a FileStore. • https://github.com/masahiro331/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/IdealDreamLast/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/osamahamad/CVE-2020-9484-Mass-Scan https://github.com/PenTestical/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/AssassinUKG/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/RepublicR0K/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/anjai94/CVE-2020-9484-exploit https://github.com/ColdFusionX/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/VICXOR/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/seanachao/CVE-2020-9484 https://github& • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 8%CPEs: 38EXPL: 1

Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. • https://github.com/irsl/CVE-2020-1967 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00011.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/157527/OpenSSL-signature_algorithms_cert-Denial-Of-Service.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/May/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/04/22/2 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=eb563247aef3e83dda7679c43f9649270462e5b1 https:/&# • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 38EXPL: 18

When using the Apache JServ Protocol (AJP), care must be taken when trusting incoming connections to Apache Tomcat. Tomcat treats AJP connections as having higher trust than, for example, a similar HTTP connection. If such connections are available to an attacker, they can be exploited in ways that may be surprising. In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99, Tomcat shipped with an AJP Connector enabled by default that listened on all configured IP addresses. It was expected (and recommended in the security guide) that this Connector would be disabled if not required. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49039 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/48143 https://github.com/sgdream/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/xindongzhuaizhuai/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/laolisafe/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/sv3nbeast/CVE-2020-1938-Tomact-file_include-file_read https://github.com/fairyming/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/dacade/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/Hancheng-Lei/Hacking-Vulnerability-CVE-2020-1938-Ghostcat https://github.com/w4fz5uck5& • CWE-285: Improper Authorization •