CVE-2012-1150 – python: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS (oCERT-2011-003)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-1150
Python before 2.6.8, 2.7.x before 2.7.3, 3.x before 3.1.5, and 3.2.x before 3.2.3 computes hash values without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input to an application that maintains a hash table. Python anteriores a v2.6.8, v2.7.x anteriores a v2.7.3, 3.x anteriores a v3.1.5, y v3.2.x anteriores a v3.2.3 procesa los valores hash sin restringir la disponibilidad para provocar colisiones predecibles, lo que permite a atacantes dependiendo del contexto provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de CPU) a través de una entrada manipulada sobre una aplicación que mantiene una tabla hash. • http://bugs.python.org/issue13703 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Oct/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00040.html http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-December/115116.html http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115892.html http://python.org/download/releases/2.6.8 http://python.org/download/releases/2.7.3 http://python.org/download/releases/3.1.5 http://python.org/download/ • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVE-2012-0845 – python: SimpleXMLRPCServer CPU usage DoS via malformed XML-RPC request
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-0845
SimpleXMLRPCServer.py in SimpleXMLRPCServer in Python before 2.6.8, 2.7.x before 2.7.3, 3.x before 3.1.5, and 3.2.x before 3.2.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via an XML-RPC POST request that contains a smaller amount of data than specified by the Content-Length header. SimpleXMLRPCServer.py en SimpleXMLRPCServer en Python antes de v2.6.8, v2.7.x antes de v2.7.3, v3.x antes de v3.1.5, y v3.2.x antes de v3.2.x, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (bucle infinito y consumo de CPU) a través de una solicitud XML-RPC POST que contiene una cantidad de datos más pequeña que lo especificado en la cabecera Content-Length. • http://bugs.python.org/issue14001 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Oct/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00040.html http://python.org/download/releases/2.6.8 http://python.org/download/releases/2.7.3 http://python.org/download/releases/3.1.5 http://python.org/download/releases/3.2.3 http://secunia.com/advisories/50858 http://secunia.com/advisories/51024 http://secunia.com/advisories/51040 http:/ • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •
CVE-2010-3492
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-3492
The asyncore module in Python before 3.2 does not properly handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, and does not have accompanying documentation describing how daemon applications should handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct denial of service attacks that terminate these applications via network connections. El módulo asyncore en Python anterior a v3.2 no controla correctamente llamadas fallidas a la función accept, y no tiene la documentación adjunta que describa cómo las aplicaciones demonio atienden las llamadas sin éxito a la función accept, lo cual facilita a atacantes remotos realizar ataques de denegación de servicio que terminan estas aplicaciones a través de conexiones de red. • http://bugs.python.org/issue6706 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:215 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:216 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/09/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/11/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/22/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/24/3 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Ad •
CVE-2008-5983 – python: untrusted python modules search path
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-5983
Untrusted search path vulnerability in the PySys_SetArgv API function in Python 2.6 and earlier, and possibly later versions, prepends an empty string to sys.path when the argv[0] argument does not contain a path separator, which might allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse Python file in the current working directory. Una vulnerabilidad de ruta de búsqueda no confiable en la función API PySys_SetArgv en Python versión 2.6 y anteriores, y posiblemente versiones posteriores, antepone una cadena vacía al archivo sys.path cuando el argumento argv [0] no contiene un separador de ruta, lo que podría permitir a los usuarios locales ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de un archivo Python de tipo caballo de Troya en el directorio de trabajo actual. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-June/042751.html http://secunia.com/advisories/34522 http://secunia.com/advisories/40194 http://secunia.com/advisories/42888 http://secunia.com/advisories/50858 http://secunia.com/advisories/51024 http://secunia.com/advisories/51040 http://secunia.com/advisories/51087 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200903-41.xml http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200904-06.xml http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist% • CWE-426: Untrusted Search Path •
CVE-2008-4864 – Python < 2.5.2 Imageop Module - 'imageop.crop()' Buffer Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-4864
Multiple integer overflows in imageop.c in the imageop module in Python 1.5.2 through 2.5.1 allow context-dependent attackers to break out of the Python VM and execute arbitrary code via large integer values in certain arguments to the crop function, leading to a buffer overflow, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-4965 and CVE-2008-1679. Múltiples desbordamientos de entero en imageop.c en el módulo imageop en Python de v1.5.2 a v2.5.1 permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto romper Python VM y ejecutar código de su elección mediante valores enteros grandes en ciertos argumentos a la función crop, llevando a un desbordamiento de búfer, una vulnerabilidad distinta a CVE-2007-4965 y CVE-2008-1679. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/10229 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32534 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2009/Feb/msg00000.html http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2008-008.html http://secunia.com/advisories/33937 http://secunia.com/advisories/37471 http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3438 http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/Modules/imageop.c?rev=66689&view=diff&r1=66689&r2=66688&p1=python/trunk/Modules/imageop.c&p2=/python/trunk/Modules/imag • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •