CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 26EXPL: 0CVE-2013-7440 – python: wildcard matching rules do not follow RFC 6125
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-7440
The ssl.match_hostname function in CPython (aka Python) before 2.7.9 and 3.x before 3.3.3 does not properly handle wildcards in hostnames, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a crafted certificate. La función ssl.match_hostname en CPython (también concida como Python) en versiones anteriores a 2.7.9 y 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.3.3 no maneja correctamente comodines en los nombres de host, lo que podría permitir a atacantes man-in-the-middle suplantar servidores a través de un certificado manipulado. Multiple flaws were found in the way Python's SSL module performed matching of certificate names containing wildcards. A remote attacker able to obtain a valid certificate that contained certain names with wildcards could have them incorrectly accepted by Python SSL clients, not following the RFC 6125 recommendations. • http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q2/483 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q2/523 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74707 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1166 https://bugs.python.org/issue17997 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224999 https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/10d0edadbcdd https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2013-7440 • CWE-19: Data Processing Errors •
CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2015-5652
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5652
Untrusted search path vulnerability in python.exe in Python through 3.5.0 on Windows allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse readline.pyd file in the current working directory. NOTE: the vendor says "It was determined that this is a longtime behavior of Python that cannot really be altered at this point." Vulnerabilidad de busqueda de ruta no confiable en python.exe en Python hasta la versión 3.5.0 en Windows, permite a usuarios locales obtener privilegios a través de un Troyano en el archivo readline.pyd en el directorio de trabajo actual. NOTA: el vendedor afirma 'Está determinado que es un comportamiento antiguo de Python que en realidad no puede ser alterado en estos momentos'. • http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN49503705/995204/index.html http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN49503705/index.html http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2015-000141 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76929 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05324755 •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 88EXPL: 2CVE-2014-9365 – python: failure to validate certificates in the HTTP client with TLS (PEP 476)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-9365
The HTTP clients in the (1) httplib, (2) urllib, (3) urllib2, and (4) xmlrpclib libraries in CPython (aka Python) 2.x before 2.7.9 and 3.x before 3.4.3, when accessing an HTTPS URL, do not (a) check the certificate against a trust store or verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's (b) Common Name or (c) subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. Los clientes HTTP en las librarias (1) httplib, (2) urllib, (3) urllib2, and (4) xmlrpclib en CPython (también conocido como Python) 2.x anterior a 2.7.9 y 3.x anterior a 3.4.3, cuando accede a una URL HTTPS, not (a) comprueba el certificado contra un almacen trust o verifica que elnombre del servidor coincide con un nombre de dominio en el campo del tema (b) Common Name o (c) subjectAltName del certificado X.509, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle falsificar servidores SSL a través de un certificado válido arbitrario. The Python standard library HTTP client modules (such as httplib or urllib) did not perform verification of TLS/SSL certificates when connecting to HTTPS servers. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to hijack connections and eavesdrop or modify transferred data. • http://bugs.python.org/issue22417 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/12/11/1 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjan2015-2370101.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinoct2015-2511968.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71639 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1166 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1162 https://access.redhat.com/errata&#x • CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •
CVSS: 6.4EPSS: 1%CPEs: 12EXPL: 3CVE-2014-7185 – python: buffer() integer overflow leading to out of bounds read
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-7185
Integer overflow in bufferobject.c in Python before 2.7.8 allows context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via a large size and offset in a "buffer" function. Desbordamiento de enteros en bufferobject.c en Python anterior a 2.7.8 permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto obtener información sensible de la memoria de procesos a través de un tamaño y desplazamiento grande en una función 'buffer'. An integer overflow flaw was found in the way the buffer() function handled its offset and size arguments. An attacker able to control those arguments could use this flaw to disclose portions of the application memory or cause it to crash. • http://bugs.python.org/issue21831 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-October/139663.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-10/msg00016.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1064.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1330.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/09/23/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/09/25/47 http:/&# • CWE-189: Numeric Errors CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 60%CPEs: 52EXPL: 4CVE-2014-1912 – Python - 'socket.recvfrom_into()' Remote Buffer Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-1912
Buffer overflow in the socket.recvfrom_into function in Modules/socketmodule.c in Python 2.5 before 2.7.7, 3.x before 3.3.4, and 3.4.x before 3.4rc1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted string. Desbordamiento de buffer en la función socket.recvfrom_into en Modules/socketmodule.c en Python 2.5 anterior a 2.7.7, 3.x anterior a 3.3.4 y 3.4.x anterior a 3.4rc1 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una cadena manipulada. It was discovered that the socket.recvfrom_into() function failed to check the size of the supplied buffer. This could lead to a buffer overflow when the function was called with an insufficiently sized buffer. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/31875 http://bugs.python.org/issue20246 http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/87673659d8f7 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-04/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-05/msg00008.html http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=GHXSmNEg http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1064.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1330.html http://www&# • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •