CVE-2017-7530 – cfme: Execution of arbitrary methods through filter param
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7530
In CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) before 5.7.3 and 5.8.x before 5.8.1, it was found that privilege check is missing when invoking arbitrary methods via filtering on VMs that MiqExpression will execute that is triggerable by API users. An attacker could use this to execute actions they should not be allowed to (e.g. destroying VMs). En CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) en versiones anteriores a la 5.7.3 y versiones 5.8.x anteriores a la 5.8.1, se ha detectado que falta la comprobación de privilegios cuando se invocan métodos arbitrarios filtrando las máquinas virtuales que MiqExpression va a ejecutar. Esta condición puede ser desencadenada por los usuarios de la API. Un atacante podría utilizarlo para ejecutar acciones para las que no debería estar autorizado (por ejemplo, destruir máquinas virtuales). • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100151 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1758 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-7530 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-7530 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465448 • CWE-862: Missing Authorization •
CVE-2016-7047 – cfme: API leaks any MiqReportResult
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-7047
A flaw was found in the CloudForms API before 5.6.3.0, 5.7.3.1 and 5.8.1.2. A user with permissions to use the MiqReportResults capability within the API could potentially view data from other tenants or groups to which they should not have access. Se ha detectado un error en la API CloudForms en versiones anteriores a las 5.6.3.0, 5.7.3.1 y 5.8.1.2. Un usuario con permisos para emplear la funcionalidad MiqReportResults en la API podría ver datos de otros inquilinos o grupos a los que no debería tener acceso. A flaw was found in the CloudForms API. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99329 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1601 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1758 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7047 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7047 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374215 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVE-2016-4471
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4471
ManageIQ in CloudForms before 4.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code. ManageIQ en CloudForms anterior a la versión 4.1, permite a los usuarios identificados remotos ejecutar código arbitrario. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340763 https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/7856 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVE-2017-2639 – CloudForms: cloudforms fails to properly check certificates when communicating with RHEV and OpenShift and custom CA
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-2639
It was found that CloudForms does not verify that the server hostname matches the domain name in the certificate when using a custom CA and communicating with Red Hat Virtualization (RHEV) and OpenShift. This would allow an attacker to spoof RHEV or OpenShift systems and potentially harvest sensitive information from CloudForms. Se ha detectado que CloudForms no verifica que el nombre de host del servidor coincida con el nombre de dominio en el certificado cuando se utiliza una CA personalizada y se comunica con Red Hat Virtualization (RHEV) y OpenShift. Esto permitiría a un atacante falsificar sistemas RHEV u OpenShift y potencialmente obtener información sensible de CloudForms. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98769 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038599 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1367 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2639 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-2639 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429632 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVE-2017-2653 – CloudForms: UI security issue on Openstack actions
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-2653
A number of unused delete routes are present in CloudForms before 5.7.2.1 which can be accessed via GET requests instead of just POST requests. This could allow an attacker to bypass the protect_from_forgery XSRF protection causing the routes to be used. This attack would require additional cross-site scripting or similar attacks in order to execute. Una serie de rutas de borrado no utilizadas están presentes en CloudForms en versiones anteriores a la 5.7.2.1, a las que se puede acceder a través de peticiones GET en lugar de sólo peticiones POST. Esto podría permitir a un atacante omitir la protección protect_from_forgery XSRF que provoca el uso de esas rutas. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96964 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0898 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2653 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-2653 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432174 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •