Page 7 of 52 results (0.017 seconds)

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 35EXPL: 0

Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: JMX). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u171, 7u161, 8u152 and 9.0.1; Java SE Embedded: 8u151; JRockit: R28.3.16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit accessible data. Note: This vulnerability can only be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using Untrusted Java Web Start applications or Untrusted Java applets, such as through a web service. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102576 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040203 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0095 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0099 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0100 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0115 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0349 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0351 https://access.redhat.com/errata/ • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

It was found that the Linux kernel's Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) implementation before 2.6.22.17 used the IPv4-only inet_sk_rebuild_header() function for both IPv4 and IPv6 DCCP connections, which could result in memory corruptions. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash the system. Se ha encontrado que la implementación del Protocolo de Control de Congestión de Datagramas (DCCP) del kernel de Linux en versiones anteriores a la 2.6.22.17 usaba la función inet_sk_rebuild_header() solo para IPv4 y conexiones DCCP IPv6, lo que podría resultar en corrupciones de memoria. Un atacante remoto podría utilizar este fallo para provocar un cierre inesperado del sistema. It was found that the Linux kernel's Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) implementation used the IPv4-only inet_sk_rebuild_header() function for both IPv4 and IPv6 DCCP connections, which could result in memory corruptions. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0323.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0346.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0347.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96529 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037909 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2634 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=f53dc67c5e7babafe239b93a11678b0e05bead51 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-2634 https://bugzilla.redhat • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 67%CPEs: 81EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99, and 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; and JRockit R28.3.9 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to JMX. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99 y 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; y JRockit R28.3.9 permite a atacantes remotos afectar a la confidencialidad, integridad y disponibilidad a través de vectores relacionados con JMX. It was discovered that the RMI server implementation in the JMX component in OpenJDK did not restrict which classes can be deserialized when deserializing authentication credentials. A remote, unauthenticated attacker able to connect to a JMX port could possibly use this flaw to trigger deserialization flaws. Oracle Java SE and JRockit contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Java Management Extensions (JMX). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05 • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 62EXPL: 0

Multiple buffer overflows in the (1) png_set_PLTE and (2) png_get_PLTE functions in libpng before 1.0.64, 1.1.x and 1.2.x before 1.2.54, 1.3.x and 1.4.x before 1.4.17, 1.5.x before 1.5.24, and 1.6.x before 1.6.19 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a small bit-depth value in an IHDR (aka image header) chunk in a PNG image. Múltiples desbordamientos de buffer en las funciones (1) png_set_PLTE y (2) png_get_PLTE en libpng en versiones anteriores a 1.0.64, 1.1.x y 1.2.x en versiones anteriores a 1.2.54, 1.3.x y 1.4.x en versiones anteriores a 1.4.17, 1.5.x en versiones anteriores a 1.5.24 y 1.6.x en versiones anteriores a 1.6.19 permiten a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de un valor bit-depth pequeño en un fragmento IHDR (también conocido como image header) en una imagen PNG. It was discovered that the png_get_PLTE() and png_set_PLTE() functions of libpng did not correctly calculate the maximum palette sizes for bit depths of less than 8. In case an application tried to use these functions in combination with properly calculated palette sizes, this could lead to a buffer overflow or out-of-bounds reads. An attacker could exploit this to cause a crash or potentially execute arbitrary code by tricking an unsuspecting user into processing a specially crafted PNG image. • http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2016/03/stable-channel-update.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172324.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172620.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172647.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172663.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 160EXPL: 0

The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue. El algoritmo RC4, utilizado en el protocolo TLS y el protocolo SSL, no combina correctamente los datos de estados con los datos de claves durante la fase de inicialización, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos realizar ataques de recuperación de texto claro contra los bytes iniciales de un flujo mediante la captura de trafico de la red que ocasionalmente depende de claves afectadas por la debilidad de la invariabilidad (Invariance Weakness), y posteriormente utilizar un acercamiento de fuerza bruta que involucra valores LSB, también conocido como el problema de 'Bar Mitzvah'. • http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04779034 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •