Page 7 of 75 results (0.008 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

CVE-2013-4364

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-4364

(1) oo-analytics-export and (2) oo-analytics-import in the openshift-origin-broker-util package in Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 1 and 2 allow local users to have unspecified impact via a symlink attack on an unspecified file in /tmp. (1) oo-analytics-export y (2) oo-analytics-import en el paquete openshift-origin-broker-util en Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 1 y 2 permiten que los usuarios locales provoquen un impacto sin especificar mediante un ataque symlink en un archivo no especificado en /tmp. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009734 • CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') •

CVSS: 3.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

CVE-2015-0238

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-0238

selinux-policy as packaged in Red Hat OpenShift 2 allows attackers to obtain process listing information via a privilege escalation attack. selinux-policy tal y como está incluido en Red Hat OpenShift 2 permite que los atacantes obtengan información de la lista de procesos mediante un ataque de escalado de privilegios. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0238 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184739 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-1000376

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-1000376

libffi requests an executable stack allowing attackers to more easily trigger arbitrary code execution by overwriting the stack. Please note that libffi is used by a number of other libraries. It was previously stated that this affects libffi version 3.2.1 but this appears to be incorrect. libffi prior to version 3.1 on 32 bit x86 systems was vulnerable, and upstream is believed to have fixed this issue in version 3.1. libffi solicita una pila ejecutable que permite que los atacantes desencadenen con más facilidad la ejecución de código arbitrario sobrescribiendo la pila. Se debe tener en cuenta que libffi es empleado por otras bibliotecas. Antes se dijo que esto afecta a la versión 3.2.1 de libffi, pero parece ser incorrecto. libffi en versiones anteriores a la 3.1 en sistemas x86 de 32 bits era vulnerable y se cree que upstream ha solucionado este problema en la versión 3.1. • http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3889 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-1000376 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-7481 – ansible: Security issue with lookup return not tainting the jinja2 environment

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7481

Ansible before versions 2.3.1.0 and 2.4.0.0 fails to properly mark lookup-plugin results as unsafe. If an attacker could control the results of lookup() calls, they could inject Unicode strings to be parsed by the jinja2 templating system, resulting in code execution. By default, the jinja2 templating language is now marked as 'unsafe' and is not evaluated. Ansible en versiones anteriores a la 2.3.1.0 y 2.4.0.0 no marca correctamente los resultados del plugin lookup como no seguros. Si un atacante pudiese controlar los resultados de las llamadas lookup(), podrían inyectar cadenas Unicode para que sean analizadas por el sistema de plantillas jinja2, resultando en una ejecución de código. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98492 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1244 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1334 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1476 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1499 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1599 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2524 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-7481 https://github.com/ansible/ansible/commit/ed56f51f185a1ffd7ea57130d260098686fcc7c2 https://lists.deb • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

CVE-2016-5409

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5409

Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 2 does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header for the GEARID cookie, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via script access to the cookies. Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 2 no incluye el indicador HTTPOnly en el encabezado Set-Cookie para la cookie GEARID, lo que hace más fácil para el atacante remoto obtener información potencialmente sensible a través del acceso con secuencias de comandos a los cookies. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97988 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366461 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •