CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 17EXPL: 2CVE-2019-17570 – xmlrpc: Deserialization of server-side exception from faultCause in XMLRPC error response
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-17570
An untrusted deserialization was found in the org.apache.xmlrpc.parser.XmlRpcResponseParser:addResult method of Apache XML-RPC (aka ws-xmlrpc) library. A malicious XML-RPC server could target a XML-RPC client causing it to execute arbitrary code. Apache XML-RPC is no longer maintained and this issue will not be fixed. Se detectó una deserialización no confiable en el método org.apache.xmlrpc.parser.XmlRpcResponseParser:addResult de la biblioteca Apache XML-RPC (también se conoce como ws-xmlrpc). Un servidor XML-RPC malicioso podría apuntar a un cliente XML-RPC causando que ejecute código arbitrario. • https://github.com/r00t4dm/CVE-2019-17570 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/01/24/2 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0310 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-17570%3B https://github.com/orangecertcc/security-research/security/advisories/GHSA-x2r6-4m45-m4jp https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/846551673bbb7ec8d691008215384bcef03a3fb004d2da845cfe88ee%401390230951%40%3Cdev.ws.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/01/msg00033.html https: • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 1CVE-2013-5123 – phlyLabs phlyMail Lite 4.03.04 - 'go' Open Redirect
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-5123
The mirroring support (-M, --use-mirrors) in Python Pip before 1.5 uses insecure DNS querying and authenticity checks which allows attackers to perform man-in-the-middle attacks. El soporte de duplicación (-M, --use-mirrors) en Python Pip versiones anteriores a la versión 1.5, utiliza consultas DNS no seguras y comprobaciones de autenticidad que permiten a atacantes realizar ataques de tipo man-in-the-middle. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/24086 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/155248.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/155291.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/08/21/17 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/08/21/18 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77520 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-5123 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-5123 https&# • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 28EXPL: 0CVE-2019-16056 – python: email.utils.parseaddr wrongly parses email addresses
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-16056
An issue was discovered in Python through 2.7.16, 3.x through 3.5.7, 3.6.x through 3.6.9, and 3.7.x through 3.7.4. The email module wrongly parses email addresses that contain multiple @ characters. An application that uses the email module and implements some kind of checks on the From/To headers of a message could be tricked into accepting an email address that should be denied. An attack may be the same as in CVE-2019-11340; however, this CVE applies to Python more generally. Se descubrió un problema en Python versiones hasta 2.7.16, versiones 3.x hasta 3.5.7, versiones 3.6.x hasta 3.6.9 y versiones 3.7.x hasta 3.7.4. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00062.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00063.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00040.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3725 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3948 https://bugs.python.org/issue • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9513 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9513
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a los bucles de recursos, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante crea múltiples flujos de solicitud y baraja continuamente la prioridad de los flujos de una manera que provoca un cambio considerable en el árbol de prioridad. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00014.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2692 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9515 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9515
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de configuraciones, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2766 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2796 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2861 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2955 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •