Page 7 of 129 results (0.202 seconds)

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

Kerberos acceptors need easy access to stable AD identifiers (eg objectSid). Samba as an AD DC now provides a way for Linux applications to obtain a reliable SID (and samAccountName) in issued tickets. Los aceptadores de Kerberos necesitan un acceso fácil a los identificadores estables de AD (por ejemplo, objectSid). Samba como un DC AD ahora proporciona una manera para que las aplicaciones de Linux para obtener un SID confiable (y samAccountName) en los boletos emitidos • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021728 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14725 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25721.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in the way samba implemented SMB1 authentication. An attacker could use this flaw to retrieve the plaintext password sent over the wire even if Kerberos authentication was required. Se ha encontrado un fallo en la forma en que Samba implementa la autenticación SMB1. Un atacante podría usar este fallo para recuperar la contraseña en texto plano enviada a través del cable, incluso si es requerida la autenticación Kerberos • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019660 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/09/msg00013.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2124.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2124 • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in the way samba implemented DCE/RPC. If a client to a Samba server sent a very large DCE/RPC request, and chose to fragment it, an attacker could replace later fragments with their own data, bypassing the signature requirements. Se ha encontrado un fallo en la forma en que samba implementa DCE/RPC. Si un cliente a un servidor Samba enviaba una petición DCE/RPC muy grande, y elegía fragmentarla, un atacante podía reemplazar los fragmentos posteriores con sus propios datos, omitiendo los requisitos de firma A flaw was found in the way samba implemented DCE/RPC. If a client to a Samba server sent a very large DCE/RPC request, and chose to fragment it, an attacker could replace later fragments with their own data, bypassing the signature requirements. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019666 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-23192 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2021-23192.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-23192 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 8.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in the way Samba maps domain users to local users. An authenticated attacker could use this flaw to cause possible privilege escalation. Se encontró un fallo en la forma en que Samba mapea usuarios del dominio a usuarios locales. Un atacante autenticado podría usar este fallo para causar una posible escalada de privilegios • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019672 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-25717 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in the way samba, as an Active Directory Domain Controller, is able to support an RODC (read-only domain controller). This would allow an RODC to print administrator tickets. Se encontró un fallo en la forma en que samba, como controlador de dominio de Active Directory, es capaz de soportar un RODC (controlador de dominio de sólo lectura). Esto permitiría a un RODC imprimir tickets de administrador • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019726 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25718.html • CWE-862: Missing Authorization •