Page 7 of 65 results (0.016 seconds)

CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 64%CPEs: 19EXPL: 2

An improper access control vulnerability in SMA100 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to bypass the path traversal checks and delete an arbitrary file potentially resulting in a reboot to factory default settings. Una vulnerabilidad de control de acceso inapropiado en SMA100 permite a un atacante remoto no autenticado omitir las comprobaciones de salto de ruta y eliminar un archivo arbitrario, resultando potencialmente en un reinicio a la configuración predeterminada de fábrica SonicWall SMA version 10.2.1.0-17sv suffers from a remote password reset vulnerability. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50430 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/164564/SonicWall-SMA-10.2.1.0-17sv-Password-Reset.html https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0021 • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

Improper neutralization of a SQL Command leading to SQL Injection vulnerability impacting end-of-life Secure Remote Access (SRA) products, specifically the SRA appliances running all 8.x firmware and 9.0.0.9-26sv or earlier Una neutralización inapropiada de un Comando SQL conllevando una vulnerabilidad de Inyección SQL impactando a los productos Secure Remote Access (SRA) al final de su vida útil, concretamente a dispositivos SRA que ejecutan todo el firmware 8.x y 9.0.0.9-26sv o anteriores SonicWall Secure Remote Access (SRA) products contain an improper neutralization of a SQL Command leading to SQL injection. • https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0017 • CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 5

fs/seq_file.c in the Linux kernel 3.16 through 5.13.x before 5.13.4 does not properly restrict seq buffer allocations, leading to an integer overflow, an Out-of-bounds Write, and escalation to root by an unprivileged user, aka CID-8cae8cd89f05. Un archivo fs/seq_file.c en el kernel de Linux versiones 3.16 hasta 5.13.x anteriores a 5.13.4, no restringe apropiadamente las asignaciones de búferes seq, conllevando a un desbordamiento de enteros, una escritura fuera de límites y una escalada a root por parte de un usuario no privilegiado, también se conoce como CID-8cae8cd89f05 An out-of-bounds write flaw was found in the Linux kernel's seq_file in the Filesystem layer. This flaw allows a local attacker with a user privilege to gain access to out-of-bound memory, leading to a system crash, leak of internal kernel information and can escalate privileges. The issue results from not validating the size_t-to-int conversion prior to performing operations. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity, confidentiality and system availability. • https://github.com/Liang2580/CVE-2021-33909 https://github.com/ChrisTheCoolHut/CVE-2021-33909 https://github.com/bbinfosec43/CVE-2021-33909 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163621/Sequoia-A-Deep-Root-In-Linuxs-Filesystem-Layer.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163671/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0079-1.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/164155/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0081-1.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165477/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0083-1 • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0

The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2a40b7bc7b94dd7de897a74571e7024f0cf0d63b https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44845 https://kc.mc • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 205EXPL: 0

An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-772220.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=fb9fa6b51defd48157eeb207f52181f735d96148 https://kb.pulse • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •