Page 71 of 528 results (0.014 seconds)

CVSS: 4.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The month name translation benaceur WordPress plugin before 2.3.8 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup) El complemento The month name translation benaceur de WordPress anterior a 2.3.8 no sanitiza ni escapa a algunas de sus configuraciones, lo que podría permitir a usuarios con privilegios elevados, como el administrador, realizar ataques de Cross-Site Scripting Almacenado incluso cuando la capacidad unfiltered_html no está permitida (por ejemplo, en una configuración multisitio) The month name translation benaceur plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.7 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled. • https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/76e000e0-314f-4e39-8871-68bf8cc95b22 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The SP Project & Document Manager WordPress plugin through 4.71 is missing validation in its upload function, allowing a user to manipulate the `user_id` to make it appear that a file was uploaded by another user El complemento SP Project & Document Manager de WordPress hasta la versión 4.71 le falta validación en su función de carga, lo que permite al usuario manipular el `user_id` para que parezca que un archivo fue subido por otro usuario. The SP Project & Document Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 4.71 via the sp_cdm_link_save_embed AJAX action to missing validation on the 'user_id' user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to upload files that look like they were uploaded by another user. • https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/01427cfb-5c51-4524-9b9d-e09a603bc34c • CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The HL Twitter WordPress plugin through 2014.1.18 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack El complemento HL Twitter WordPress hasta la versión 2014.1.18 no tiene activada la verificación CSRF al actualizar su configuración, lo que podría permitir a los atacantes hacer que un administrador que haya iniciado sesión los cambie mediante un ataque CSRF. The HL Twitter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2014.1.18. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the hl_twitter_settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. • https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/c1f6ed2c-0f84-4b13-b39e-5cb91443c2b1 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The HL Twitter WordPress plugin through 2014.1.18 does not have CSRF check when unlinking twitter accounts, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform such actions via a CSRF attack El complemento HL Twitter WordPress hasta 2014.1.18 no tiene verificación CSRF al desvincular cuentas de Twitter, lo que podría permitir a los atacantes hacer que los administradores registrados realicen tales acciones a través de un ataque CSRF. The HL Twitter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2014.1.18. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the hl_twitter_settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to unlink a Twitter account via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. • https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/c59a8b49-6f3e-452b-ba9b-50b80c522ee9 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The Base64 Encoder/Decoder WordPress plugin through 0.9.2 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin El complemento Base64 Encoder/Decoder de WordPress hasta la versión 0.9.2 no sanitiza ni escapa un parámetro antes de devolverlo a la página, lo que genera una Cross-Site Scripting Reflejado que podría usarse contra usuarios con privilegios elevados, como el administrador. The Base64 Encoder/Decoder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the 'string' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. • https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/ff5411b1-9e04-4e72-a502-e431d774642a • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •