CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 43EXPL: 21CVE-2019-5736 – runc < 1.0-rc6 (Docker < 18.09.2) - Container Breakout
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-5736
runc through 1.0-rc6, as used in Docker before 18.09.2 and other products, allows attackers to overwrite the host runc binary (and consequently obtain host root access) by leveraging the ability to execute a command as root within one of these types of containers: (1) a new container with an attacker-controlled image, or (2) an existing container, to which the attacker previously had write access, that can be attached with docker exec. This occurs because of file-descriptor mishandling, related to /proc/self/exe. runc, hasta la versión 1.0-rc6, tal y como se emplea en Docker, en versiones anteriores a la 18.09.2 y otros productos, permite que los atacantes sobrescriban el binario del host runc (y, así, obtengan acceso root al host) aprovechando la capacidad para ejecutar un comando como root con uno de estos tipos de contenedores: (1) un nuevo contenedor con una imagen controlada por el atacante o (2) un contenedor existente, para el cual el atacante contaba previamente con acceso de escritura, que puede adjuntarse con docker exec. Esto ocurre debido a la gestión incorrecta del descriptor de archivos; esto está relacionado con /proc/self/exe. A flaw was found in the way runc handled system file descriptors when running containers. A malicious container could use this flaw to overwrite contents of the runc binary and consequently run arbitrary commands on the container host system. • https://github.com/Frichetten/CVE-2019-5736-PoC https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46369 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46359 https://github.com/twistlock/RunC-CVE-2019-5736 https://github.com/jas502n/CVE-2019-5736 https://github.com/RyanNgWH/CVE-2019-5736-POC https://github.com/zyriuse75/CVE-2019-5736-PoC https://github.com/likescam/CVE-2019-5736 https://github.com/geropl/CVE-2019-5736 https://github.com/si1ent-le/CVE-2019-5736 https://github.com/ • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-672: Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7658 – jetty: Incorrect header handling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7658
In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization. En Eclipse Jetty Server, en versiones 9.2.x y anteriores, versiones 9.3.x (todas las configuraciones que no sean HTTP/1.x) y versiones 9.4.x (todas las configuraciones HTTP/1.x), cuando se presentan con dos cabeceras content-lengths, Jetty ignora la segunda. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106566 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535669 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread& • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7657 – jetty: HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7657
In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request. En Eclipse Jetty, en versiones 9.2.x y anteriores, versiones 9.3.x (todas las configuraciones) y versiones 9.4.x (configuración personalizada con el cumplimiento RFC2616 habilitado), los fragmentos transfer-encoding se gestionan de forma incorrecta. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0910 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535668 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache. • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 3%CPEs: 63EXPL: 0CVE-2018-7185
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-7185
The protocol engine in ntp 4.2.6 before 4.2.8p11 allows a remote attackers to cause a denial of service (disruption) by continually sending a packet with a zero-origin timestamp and source IP address of the "other side" of an interleaved association causing the victim ntpd to reset its association. El motor de protocolo en ntp, en versiones 4.2.6 anteriores a la 4.2.8p11, permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (interrupción) mediante el envío continuado de un paquete con una marca de tiempo zero-origin y la dirección IP de origen "del otro lado" de una asociación intercalada que provoca que el ntpd de la víctima restablezca su asociación. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/146631/Slackware-Security-Advisory-ntp-Updates.html http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/NtpBug3454 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/541824/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103339 https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-18:02.ntp.asc https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201805-12 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0001 https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbux03962en&# •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0CVE-2018-7170
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-7170
ntpd in ntp 4.2.x before 4.2.8p7 and 4.3.x before 4.3.92 allows authenticated users that know the private symmetric key to create arbitrarily-many ephemeral associations in order to win the clock selection of ntpd and modify a victim's clock via a Sybil attack. This issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2016-1549. ntpd en ntp, en versiones 4.2.x anteriores a la 4.2.8p7 y versiones 4.3.x anteriores a la 4.3.92, permite que usuarios autenticados que conozcan la clave privada simétrica creen de forma arbitraria muchas asociaciones efímeras para ganar la selección de reloj de ntpd y modifiquen el reloj de una víctima mediante un ataque Sybil. Este problema existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2016-1549. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/146631/Slackware-Security-Advisory-ntp-Updates.html http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/NtpBug3415 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/541824/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103194 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550214 https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-18:02.ntp.asc https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201805-12 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0001 https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc •