CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 2CVE-2018-1124 – Procps-ng - Multiple Vulnerabilities
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1124
procps-ng before version 3.3.15 is vulnerable to multiple integer overflows leading to a heap corruption in file2strvec function. This allows a privilege escalation for a local attacker who can create entries in procfs by starting processes, which could result in crashes or arbitrary code execution in proc utilities run by other users. procps-ng en versiones anteriores a la 3.3.15 es vulnerable a múltiples desbordamientos de enteros que conducen a una corrupción de la memoria dinámica (heap) en la función file2strvec. Esto permite el escalado de privilegios para un atacante local que puede crear entradas en procfs empezando procesos, lo que podría resultar en cierres inesperados o la ejecución de código arbitrario en las utilidades proc ejecutadas por otros usuarios. Multiple integer overflows leading to heap corruption flaws were discovered in file2strvec(). These vulnerabilities can lead to privilege escalation for a local attacker who can create entries in procfs by starting processes, which will lead to crashes or arbitrary code execution in proc utilities run by other users (eg pgrep, pkill, pidof, w). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44806 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00059.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q2/122 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104214 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041057 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1700 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1777 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1820 https://access.redha • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5CVE-2018-3639 – AMD / ARM / Intel - Speculative Execution Variant 4 Speculative Store Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3639
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 7.9EPSS: 97%CPEs: 22EXPL: 4CVE-2018-1111 – DynoRoot DHCP Client - Command Injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1111
DHCP packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7, Fedora 28, and earlier are vulnerable to a command injection flaw in the NetworkManager integration script included in the DHCP client. A malicious DHCP server, or an attacker on the local network able to spoof DHCP responses, could use this flaw to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on systems using NetworkManager and configured to obtain network configuration using the DHCP protocol. Los paquetes DHCP en Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 y 7, Fedora 28 y anteriores son vulnerables a un error de inyección de comandos en el script de integración NetworkManager incluido en el cliente DHCP. Un servidor DHCP malicioso o un atacante en la red ocal capaz de suplantar respuestas DHCP podría emplear este error para ejecutar comandos arbitrarios con privilegios root en sistemas que emplean NetworkManager y se configuran para obtener la configuración de red mediante el protocolo de configuración dinámica de host (DHCP). A command injection flaw was found in the NetworkManager integration script included in the DHCP client packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44652 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44890 https://github.com/kkirsche/CVE-2018-1111 https://github.com/knqyf263/CVE-2018-1111 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104195 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040912 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1453 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1456 https://access.redhat.com&#x • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 5%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10184 – haproxy: Heap buffer overflow in mux_h2.c:h2_process_demux() can allow attackers to cause a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10184
An issue was discovered in HAProxy before 1.8.8. The incoming H2 frame length was checked against the max_frame_size setting instead of being checked against the bufsize. The max_frame_size only applies to outgoing traffic and not to incoming, so if a large enough frame size is advertised in the SETTINGS frame, a wrapped frame will be defragmented into a temporary allocated buffer where the second fragment may overflow the heap by up to 16 kB. It is very unlikely that this can be exploited for code execution given that buffers are very short lived and their addresses not realistically predictable in production, but the likelihood of an immediate crash is absolutely certain. Se ha descubierto un problema en versiones anteriores a la 1.8.8 de HAProxy. • http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-1.8.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=cd117685f0cff4f2f5577ef6a21eaae96ebd9f28 http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=3f0e1ec70173593f4c2b3681b26c04a4ed5fc588 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1372 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-10184 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1569297 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •
CVSS: 8.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1087 – Kernel: KVM: error in exception handling leads to wrong debug stack value
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1087
kernel KVM before versions kernel 4.16, kernel 4.16-rc7, kernel 4.17-rc1, kernel 4.17-rc2 and kernel 4.17-rc3 is vulnerable to a flaw in the way the Linux kernel's KVM hypervisor handled exceptions delivered after a stack switch operation via Mov SS or Pop SS instructions. During the stack switch operation, the processor did not deliver interrupts and exceptions, rather they are delivered once the first instruction after the stack switch is executed. An unprivileged KVM guest user could use this flaw to crash the guest or, potentially, escalate their privileges in the guest. kernel KVM en versiones anteriores al kernel 4.16, kernel 4.16-rc7, kernel 4.17-rc1, kernel 4.17-rc2 y kernel 4.17-rc3 es vulnerable a un error en la forma en la que el hipervisor KVM del kernel de Linux gestiona las excepciones lanzadas tras una operación de cambio de pila mediante instrucciones Mov SS o Pop SS. Durante la operación de cambio de pila, el procesador no lanzó interrupciones y excepciones, sino que las lanza una vez se ha ejecutado la primera instrucción tras el cambio de pila. Un usuario invitado sin privilegios de KVM podría usar este error para provocar el cierre inesperado del guest o escalar sus privilegios en el guest. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/05/08/5 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104127 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040862 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1318 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1345 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1347 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1348 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1355 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1524 https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabili • CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges •