CVSS: 2.6EPSS: 3%CPEs: 65EXPL: 3CVE-2006-1494 – PHP 4.x - 'tempnam() open_basedir' Restriction Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-1494
Directory traversal vulnerability in file.c in PHP 4.4.2 and 5.1.2 allows local users to bypass open_basedir restrictions allows remote attackers to create files in arbitrary directories via the tempnam function. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/27595 ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20060701-01-U http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0549.html http://secunia.com/advisories/19599 http://secunia.com/advisories/19775 http://secunia.com/advisories/19979 http://secunia.com/advisories/21031 http://secunia.com/advisories/21125 http://secunia.com/advisories/21135 http://secunia.com/advisories/21202 http://secunia.com/advisories/21252 http://secunia.com/advisor •
CVSS: 2.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 65EXPL: 3CVE-2006-1608 – PHP 4.x - 'copy() Safe_Mode' Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-1608
The copy function in file.c in PHP 4.4.2 and 5.1.2 allows local users to bypass safe mode and read arbitrary files via a source argument containing a compress.zlib:// URI. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/27596 http://secunia.com/advisories/19599 http://secunia.com/advisories/19775 http://secunia.com/advisories/21125 http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityalert/37 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/678 http://securitytracker.com/id?1015882 http://us.php.net/releases/5_1_3.php http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:074 http://www.osvdb.org/24487 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/430461/100/0/threaded ht •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 22%CPEs: 75EXPL: 1CVE-2006-1490 – PHP 4.x/5.x - 'Html_Entity_Decode()' Information Disclosure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-1490
PHP before 5.1.3-RC1 might allow remote attackers to obtain portions of memory via crafted binary data sent to a script that processes user input in the html_entity_decode function and sends the encoded results back to the client, aka a "binary safety" issue. NOTE: this issue has been referred to as a "memory leak," but it is an information leak that discloses memory contents. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/27508 ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20060501-01-U.asc http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127939 http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/php-src/ext/standard/html.c?r1=1.112&r2=1.113 http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/php-src/ext/standard/html.c?view=log http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304829 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2006/Nov/msg00001.html http://rhn.redhat.com/erra •
CVSS: 3.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 30EXPL: 2CVE-2006-1014 – PHP 4.x/5.0/5.1 - 'mb_send_mail()' Restriction Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-1014
Argument injection vulnerability in certain PHP 4.x and 5.x applications, when used with sendmail and when accepting remote input for the additional_parameters argument to the mb_send_mail function, allows context-dependent attackers to read and create arbitrary files by providing extra -C and -X arguments to sendmail. NOTE: it could be argued that this is a class of technology-specific vulnerability, instead of a particular instance; if so, then this should not be included in CVE. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/27335 http://secunia.com/advisories/18694 http://secunia.com/advisories/19979 http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/05-05-2006.html http://www.osvdb.org/23534 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426342/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16878 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0772 •
CVSS: 6.4EPSS: 7%CPEs: 75EXPL: 1CVE-2006-1015 – PHP 4.x/5.0/5.1 with Sendmail Mail Function - 'additional_param' Arbitrary File Creation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-1015
Argument injection vulnerability in certain PHP 3.x, 4.x, and 5.x applications, when used with sendmail and when accepting remote input for the additional_parameters argument to the mail function, allows remote attackers to read and create arbitrary files via the sendmail -C and -X arguments. NOTE: it could be argued that this is a class of technology-specific vulnerability, instead of a particular instance; if so, then this should not be included in CVE. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/27334 http://secunia.com/advisories/19979 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/517 http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/05-05-2006.html http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426497/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16878 •