Page 75 of 923 results (0.026 seconds)

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0

The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 3%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java 8 before SR1, 7 R1 before SR2 FP11, 7 before SR9, 6 R1 before SR8 FP4, 6 before SR16 FP4, and 5.0 before SR16 FP10 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unknown vectors related to the Java Virtual Machine. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en IBM Java 8 anterior a SR1, 7 R1 anterior a SR2 FP11, 7 anterior a SR9, 6 R1 anterior a SR8 FP4, 6 anterior a SR16 FP4, y 5.0 anterior a SR16 FP10 permite a atacantes remotos ganar privilegios a través de vectores desconocidos relacionados con Java Virtual Machine. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00031.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1006.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1007.html http://rhn.redhat.com&#x •

CVSS: 2.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0

Xen 4.2.x through 4.5.x does not initialize certain fields, which allows certain remote service domains to obtain sensitive information from memory via a (1) XEN_DOMCTL_gettscinfo or (2) XEN_SYSCTL_getdomaininfolist request. Xen 4.2.x hasta 4.5.x no inicializa ciertos campos, lo que permite a ciertos dominios de servicio remotos obtener información sensible de la memoria a través de una solicitud (1) XEN_DOMCTL_gettscinfo o (2) XEN_SYSCTL_getdomaininfolist. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/156005.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-May/156979.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-May/157006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00018.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00001.html http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3414 h • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 8%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

Buffer overflow in the gethostbyname_r and other unspecified NSS functions in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.22 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted DNS response, which triggers a call with a misaligned buffer. Desbordamiento de buffer en gethostbyname_r y otras funciones NSS no especificadas en la librería C de GNU (también conocida como glibc o libc6) en versiones anteriores a 2.22, permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto provocar una denegación de servicio (caída) o ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una respuesta DNS manipulada, lo que desencadena una llamada con un buffer incorrectamente alineado. A buffer overflow flaw was found in the way glibc's gethostbyname_r() and other related functions computed the size of a buffer when passed a misaligned buffer as input. An attacker able to make an application call any of these functions with a misaligned buffer could use this flaw to crash the application or, potentially, execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the user running the application. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-February/177404.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-08/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00036.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3480 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74255 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032178 http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2985-1 http://www.ubu • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 6.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 1

Google Chrome before 42.0.2311.90 does not properly consider the interaction of page navigation with the handling of touch events and gesture events, which allows remote attackers to trigger unintended UI actions via a crafted web site that conducts a "tapjacking" attack. Google Chrome anterior a 42.0.2311.90 no considera correctamente la interacción de la navegación de páginas con el manejo de los eventos 'táctiles' (touch) y los eventos de 'gestos' (gesture), lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar acciones no intencionadas de la interfaz del usuario a través de un sitio web manipulado que realiza un ataque de 'tapjacking'. • http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2015/04/stable-channel-update_14.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-04/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-11/msg00024.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0816.html http://ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2570-1 http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3238 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032209 https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=418402 https://codereview.chromium.org/628763003 http • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) CWE-1021: Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames •