Page 8 of 114 results (0.017 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0

Apache HTTP Server, in all releases prior to 2.2.32 and 2.4.25, was liberal in the whitespace accepted from requests and sent in response lines and headers. Accepting these different behaviors represented a security concern when httpd participates in any chain of proxies or interacts with back-end application servers, either through mod_proxy or using conventional CGI mechanisms, and may result in request smuggling, response splitting and cache pollution. El servidor HTTP Apache, en todas las distribuciones anteriores a la 2.2.32 y la 2.4.25 era liberal en el espacio en blanco aceptado de peticiones y enviado en lineas y cabeceras de respuesta. La aceptación de estos comportamientos diferentes representaba un problema a nivel de seguridad cuando httpd participa en cualquier cadena de proxies o interactúa con servidores de aplicaciones backend, ya sea mediante mod_proxy o utilizando mecanismos CGI convencionales y puede dar lugar al tráfico de peticiones, división de respuestas y contaminación de la caché. It was discovered that the HTTP parser in httpd incorrectly allowed certain characters not permitted by the HTTP protocol specification to appear unencoded in HTTP request headers. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3796 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95077 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037508 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0906 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1161 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1721 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 17%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0

The Apache HTTP Server through 2.4.23 follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, aka an "httpoxy" issue. NOTE: the vendor states "This mitigation has been assigned the identifier CVE-2016-5387"; in other words, this is not a CVE ID for a vulnerability. El Apache HTTP Server hasta la versión 2.4.23 sigue a RFC 3875 sección 4.1.18 y por lo tanto no protege aplicaciones de la presencia de datos de clientes no confiables en ambiente variable de HTTP_PROXY, lo que puede permitir a atacantes remotos redireccionar el tráfico HTTP saliente de aplicación a un servidor proxy arbitrario a través de una cabecera Proxy manipulada en una petición HTTP, también conocido como problema "httpoxy". NOTA: el vendedor afirma "Se ha asignado a esta mitigación el identificador CVE-2016-5387"; en otras palabras, esto no es un CVE ID para una vulnerabilidad. It was discovered that httpd used the value of the Proxy header from HTTP requests to initialize the HTTP_PROXY environment variable for CGI scripts, which in turn was incorrectly used by certain HTTP client implementations to configure the proxy for outgoing HTTP requests. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-07/msg00059.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1624.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1625.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1648.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1649.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1650.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3623 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/797896 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 6%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

The chunked transfer coding implementation in the Apache HTTP Server before 2.4.14 does not properly parse chunk headers, which allows remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks via a crafted request, related to mishandling of large chunk-size values and invalid chunk-extension characters in modules/http/http_filters.c. Vulnerabilidad en la implementación de la codificación de transferencia fragmentada en el Servidor HTTP Apache en versiones anteriores a la 2.4.14 no analiza adecuadamente los fragmentos de las cabeceras lo cual permite a atacantes remotos efectuar ataques de infiltración de solicitudes HTTP a través de peticiones manipuladas, relacionada con el mal manejo de los valores fragmentados de gran tamaño y extensiones fragmentadas no válidas en modules/http/http_filters.c. Multiple flaws were found in the way httpd parsed HTTP requests and responses using chunked transfer encoding. A remote attacker could use these flaws to create a specially crafted request, which httpd would decode differently from an HTTP proxy software in front of it, possibly leading to HTTP request smuggling attacks. • http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10735 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-10/msg00011.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144493176821532&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1666.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1667.html http&# • CWE-17: DEPRECATED: Code CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-172: Encoding Error •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 5%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0

The lua_websocket_read function in lua_request.c in the mod_lua module in the Apache HTTP Server through 2.4.12 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (child-process crash) by sending a crafted WebSocket Ping frame after a Lua script has called the wsupgrade function. La función lua_websocket_read en lua_request.c en el módulo mod_lua en Apache HTTP Server hasta 2.4.12 permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída del proceso hijo) mediante el envío de un Frame WebSocket Ping manipulado después de que una secuencia de comandos Lua haya llamado a la función wsupgrade. A denial of service flaw was found in the way the mod_lua httpd module processed certain WebSocket Ping requests. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted WebSocket Ping packet that would cause the httpd child process to crash. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2015-0099.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-03/msg00006.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1666.html http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/CHANGES http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork&#x • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 24%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

The mod_cgid module in the Apache HTTP Server before 2.4.10 does not have a timeout mechanism, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process hang) via a request to a CGI script that does not read from its stdin file descriptor. El módulo mod_cgid en Apache HTTP Server anterior a 2.4.10 no tiene un mecanismo de timeout, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (cuelgue del proceso) a través de una solicitud en una secuencia de comandos CGI que no lee desde su descriptor de ficheros stdin. A denial of service flaw was found in the way httpd's mod_cgid module executed CGI scripts that did not read data from the standard input. A remote attacker could submit a specially crafted request that would cause the httpd child process to hang indefinitely. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0304.html http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0305.html http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Apr/msg00001.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143403519711434&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143748090628601&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050155601375&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144493176821532&w=2 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/130769/ • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •