CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 18EXPL: 4CVE-2019-6116 – Ghostscript 9.26 - Pseudo-Operator Remote Code Execution
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6116
In Artifex Ghostscript through 9.26, ephemeral or transient procedures can allow access to system operators, leading to remote code execution. En Artifex Ghostscript hasta la versión 9.26, los procedimientos ephemeral o transient pueden permitir el acceso a los operadores del sistema, lo que conduce a la ejecución remota de código. It was found that ghostscript could leak sensitive operators on the operand stack when a pseudo-operator pushes a subroutine. A specially crafted PostScript file could use this flaw to escape the -dSAFER protection in order to, for example, have access to the file system outside of the SAFER constraints. Ghostscript has an issue with pseudo-operators that can lead to remote code execution. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46242 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-01/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-01/msg00048.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/151307/Ghostscript-Pseudo-Operator-Remote-Code-Execution.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152367/Slackware-Security-Advisory-ghostscript-Updates.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/01/23/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/03/21/1 http: •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2018-19478
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-19478
In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an extremely long running computation when parsing the file. En las versiones anteriores de la 9.26 de Artifex Ghostscript, un archivo PDF especialmente manipulado puede provocar un cálculo de ejecución extremadamente largo al analizar el archivo. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=0a7e5a1c309fa0911b892fa40996a7d55d90bace http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106445 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699856 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655607 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/12/msg00019.html https://www.ghostscript.com/doc/9.26/History9.htm • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 1CVE-2018-19134 – ghostscript: Type confusion in setpattern (700141)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-19134
In Artifex Ghostscript through 9.25, the setpattern operator did not properly validate certain types. A specially crafted PostScript document could exploit this to crash Ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the context of the Ghostscript process. This is a type confusion issue because of failure to check whether the Implementation of a pattern dictionary was a structure type. En Artifex Ghostscript hasta la versión 9.25, el operador setpattern no validaba ciertos tipos correctamente. Un documento PostScript especialmente manipulado podría explotar esto para provocar el cierre inesperado de Ghostscript o ejecutar código arbitrario en el contexto del proceso Ghostscript. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=693baf02152119af6e6afd30bb8ec76d14f84bbf http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106278 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3834 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700141 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/12/msg00019.html https://semmle.com/news/semmle-discovers-severe-vulnerability-ghostscript-postscript-pdf https://www.ghostscript.com/doc/9.26/News.htm https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-19134 htt • CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2018-16863 – ghostscript: incomplete fix for CVE-2018-16509
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16863
It was found that RHSA-2018:2918 did not fully fix CVE-2018-16509. An attacker could possibly exploit another variant of the flaw and bypass the -dSAFER protection to, for example, execute arbitrary shell commands via a specially crafted PostScript document. This only affects ghostscript 9.07 as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Se ha detectado que RHSA-2018:2918 no ha resuelto por completo CVE-2018-16509. Un atacante podría explotar otra variante del fallo y omitir la protección -dSAFER para, por ejemplo, ejecutar comandos de shell arbitrarios a través de un documento PostScript especialmente diseñado. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=520bb0ea7519 http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=5516c614dc33 http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=78911a01b67d http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=79cccf641486 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3761 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi? • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 15EXPL: 1CVE-2018-19475 – ghostscript: access bypass in psi/zdevice2.c (700153)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-19475
psi/zdevice2.c in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions because available stack space is not checked when the device remains the same. psi/zdevice2.c en Artifex Ghostscript en versiones anteriores a la 9.26 permite a los atacantes remotos omitir las restricciones de acceso planeadas debido a que el espacio de pila disponible no se comprueba cuando el dispositivo no cambia. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=3005fcb9bb160af199e761e03bc70a9f249a987e http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=aeea342904978c9fe17d85f4906a0f6fcce2d315 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106154 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0229 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700153 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00036.html https://semmle.com/news/semmle-discovers-severe-vulnerabilit • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •