Page 8 of 41 results (0.014 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

The DHCP relay agent in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and PIX 7.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (dropped packets) via a DHCPREQUEST or DHCPINFORM message that causes multiple DHCPACK messages to be sent from DHCP servers to the agent, which consumes the memory allocated for a local buffer. NOTE: this issue only occurs when multiple DHCP servers are used. El agente transmisor DHCP en Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) y PIX 7.2 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (abandono de paquetes) mediante un mensaje DHCPREQUEST o DHCPINFORM que provoca que múltiples mensajes DHCPACK sean enviados desde servidores DHCP al agente, lo cual consume la memoria reservada para un búfer local. NOTA: esta situación sólo se da cuando se usan múltiples servidores DHCP. • http://secunia.com/advisories/25109 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080833172.html http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/530057 http://www.osvdb.org/35330 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23763 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017999 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018000 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1635 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34026 •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0

Cisco PIX 500 Series Security Appliances and ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, when running 7.0(x) up to 7.0(5) and 7.1(x) up to 7.1(2.4), and Firewall Services Module (FWSM) 3.1(x) up to 3.1(1.6), causes the EXEC password, local user passwords, and the enable password to be changed to a "non-random value" under certain circumstances, which causes administrators to be locked out and might allow attackers to gain access. Cisco PIX 500 Series Security Appliances y ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, cuando ejecutan 7.0(x) hasta 7.0(5) y 7.1(x) hasta 7.1(2.4), y el Firewall Services Module (FWSM) 3.1(x) hasta 3.1(1.6), provoca que la contraseña EXEC, las contraseñas de usuario local, y la contraseña de activación se cambien a un "valor no aleatorio" bajo determinadas circunstancias, lo que provoca un bloqueo a los administradores y podría permitir a los atacantes obtener acceso. • http://secunia.com/advisories/21616 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016738 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016739 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016740 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20060823-firewall.shtml http://www.osvdb.org/28143 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19681 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3367 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/28540 •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 5%CPEs: 138EXPL: 0

Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1 protocol, as implemented on Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, and PIX firewalls, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via a flood of IKE Phase-1 packets that exceed the session expiration rate. NOTE: it has been argued that this is due to a design weakness of the IKE version 1 protocol, in which case other vendors and implementations would also be affected. Protocolo Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1, implementado para Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, y PIX firewalls, permite a atacantes remotos provocar denegación de servicio (agotamiento de recursos) a través de un flood de paquetes IKE Phase-1 que exceden el ratio de expiración de la sesión. NOTA: se ha indicado que esto es debido a un diseño debil del protocolo IKe version 1, en cuyo caso otros vendedores e implementaciones podrían verse afectados. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2006-07/0531.html http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1293 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016582 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/tsd_technology_security_response09186a00806f33d4.html http://www.nta-monitor.com/posts/2006/07/cisco-concentrator-dos.html http://www.osvdb.org/29068 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/441203/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19176 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities& •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 33%CPEs: 66EXPL: 2

Cisco PIX/ASA 7.1.x before 7.1(2) and 7.0.x before 7.0(5), PIX 6.3.x before 6.3.5(112), and FWSM 2.3.x before 2.3(4) and 3.x before 3.1(7), when used with Websense/N2H2, allows remote attackers to bypass HTTP access restrictions by splitting the GET method of an HTTP request into multiple packets, which prevents the request from being sent to Websense for inspection, aka bugs CSCsc67612, CSCsc68472, and CSCsd81734. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/27830 http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-May/045899.html http://secunia.com/advisories/20044 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016039 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016040 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/netmgtsw/ps2032/tsd_products_security_response09186a00806824ec.html http://www.osvdb.org/25453 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433270/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17883 http://www.vsecurity.c •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 156EXPL: 0

The Downloadable RADIUS ACLs feature in Cisco PIX and VPN 3000 concentrators, when creating an ACL on the Cisco Secure Access Control Server (CS ACS), generates a random internal name for an ACL that is also used as a hidden user name and password, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges by sniffing the username from the cleartext portion of a RADIUS session, then using the password to log in to another device that uses CS ACS. • http://secunia.com/advisories/18141 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_field_notice09186a00805bf1c4.shtml http://www.osvdb.org/22193 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/420020/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/420103/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16025 •