Page 8 of 75 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0

The Bzip2 decompression decoder function doesn't allow setting size restrictions on the decompressed output data (which affects the allocation size used during decompression). All users of Bzip2Decoder are affected. The malicious input can trigger an OOME and so a DoS attack La función Bzip2 decompression decoder no permite establecer restricciones de tamaño en los datos de salida descomprimidos (lo que afecta al tamaño de asignación usado durante la descompresión). Todos los usuarios de Bzip2Decoder están afectados. La entrada maliciosa puede desencadenar un OOME y así un ataque de DoS A flaw was found in Netty's netty-codec due to size restrictions for decompressed data in the Bzip2Decoder. • https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-grg4-wf29-r9vv https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r06a145c9bd41a7344da242cef07977b24abe3349161ede948e30913d%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5406eaf3b07577d233b9f07cfc8f26e28369e6bab5edfcab41f28abb%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5e05eba32476c580412f9fbdfc9b8782d5b40558018ac4ac07192a04%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r75490c61c2cb7b6ae2c81238fd52ae13636c60435abcd732d41531a0%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E ht • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0

The Snappy frame decoder function doesn't restrict the chunk length which may lead to excessive memory usage. Beside this it also may buffer reserved skippable chunks until the whole chunk was received which may lead to excessive memory usage as well. This vulnerability can be triggered by supplying malicious input that decompresses to a very big size (via a network stream or a file) or by sending a huge skippable chunk. La función Snappy frame decoder no restringe la longitud de los trozos, lo que puede conllevar a un uso excesivo de memoria. Además, también puede almacenar en el búfer trozos omitibles reservados hasta que se reciba el trozo completo, lo que también puede conllevar a un uso excesivo de memoria. • https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-9vjp-v76f-g363 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r06a145c9bd41a7344da242cef07977b24abe3349161ede948e30913d%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5406eaf3b07577d233b9f07cfc8f26e28369e6bab5edfcab41f28abb%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5e05eba32476c580412f9fbdfc9b8782d5b40558018ac4ac07192a04%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r75490c61c2cb7b6ae2c81238fd52ae13636c60435abcd732d41531a0%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E ht • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 2

An out-of-bounds (OOB) memory read flaw was found in the Qualcomm IPC router protocol in the Linux kernel. A missing sanity check allows a local attacker to gain access to out-of-bounds memory, leading to a system crash or a leak of internal kernel information. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se ha encontrado un defecto de lectura de memoria fuera de límites (OOB) en el protocolo de router Qualcomm IPC en el kernel de Linux. Una falta de comprobación de saneo permite a un atacante local conseguir acceso de memoria fuera de límites, conllevando a un bloqueo del sistema o un filtrado de información interna del kernel. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997961 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/commit/?id=7e78c597c3eb https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7e78c597c3ebfd0cb329aa09a838734147e4f117 https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/7e78c597c3ebfd0cb329aa09a838734147e4f117 https://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2021/08/17/124 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220407-0007 https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/08/27 • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 27EXPL: 1

A flaw was found in python. An improperly handled HTTP response in the HTTP client code of python may allow a remote attacker, who controls the HTTP server, to make the client script enter an infinite loop, consuming CPU time. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se ha encontrado un fallo en python. Una respuesta HTTP manejada inapropiadamente en el código del cliente HTTP de python puede permitir a un atacante remoto, que controle el servidor HTTP, hacer que el script del cliente entre en un bucle infinito, consumiendo tiempo de CPU. • https://bugs.python.org/issue44022 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1995162 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25916 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/26503 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/05/msg00024.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00039.html https://python-security.readthedocs.io/vuln/urllib-100-continue-loop.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220407-0009 https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-3737 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 46EXPL: 1

When curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 connects to an IMAP or POP3 server to retrieve data using STARTTLS to upgrade to TLS security, the server can respond and send back multiple responses at once that curl caches. curl would then upgrade to TLS but not flush the in-queue of cached responses but instead continue using and trustingthe responses it got *before* the TLS handshake as if they were authenticated.Using this flaw, it allows a Man-In-The-Middle attacker to first inject the fake responses, then pass-through the TLS traffic from the legitimate server and trick curl into sending data back to the user thinking the attacker's injected data comes from the TLS-protected server. Cuando en curl versiones posteriores a 7.20.0 incluyéndola, y versiones anteriores a 7.78.0 incluyéndola, se conecta a un servidor IMAP o POP3 para recuperar datos usando STARTTLS para actualizar a la seguridad TLS, el servidor puede responder y enviar múltiples respuestas a la vez que curl almacena en caché. curl entonces actualizaría a TLS pero no vaciaría la cola de respuestas almacenadas en caché, sino que continuaría usando y confiando en las respuestas que obtuvo *antes* del protocolo de enlace TLS como si estuvieran autenticadas. Usando este fallo, permite a un atacante de tipo Man-In-The-Middle inyectar primero las respuestas falsas, luego pasar mediante el tráfico TLS del servidor legítimo y engañar a curl para que envíe datos de vuelta al usuario pensando que los datos inyectados por el atacante provienen del servidor protegido por TLS A flaw was found in curl. The flaw lies in how curl handles cached or pipelined responses that it receives from either a IMAP, POP3, SMTP or FTP server before the TLS upgrade using STARTTLS. In such a scenario curl even after upgrading to TLS would trust these cached responses treating them as valid and authenticated and use them. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Mar/29 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1334763 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/09/msg00022.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/08/msg00017.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/APOAK4X73EJTAPTSVT7IRVDMUWVXNWGD https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RWLEC6YVEM2HWUBX67 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •