CVE-2008-1419 – vorbis: zero-dim codebooks can cause crash, infinite loop or heap overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-1419
Xiph.org libvorbis 1.2.0 and earlier does not properly handle a zero value for codebook.dim, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash or infinite loop) or trigger an integer overflow. Xiph.org libvorbis 1.2.0 y versiones anteriores no maneja apropiadamente un valor cero de codebook.dim, lo cual permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída o bucle infinito) o disparar un desbordamiento de entero. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-06/msg00001.html http://secunia.com/advisories/30234 http://secunia.com/advisories/30237 http://secunia.com/advisories/30247 http://secunia.com/advisories/30259 http://secunia.com/advisories/30479 http://secunia.com/advisories/30581 http://secunia.com/advisories/30820 http://secunia.com/advisories/32946 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200806-09.xml http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1591 http://www.mandri • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •
CVE-2008-1198 – initscripts: IPSec ifup script allows for aggressive IKE mode
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-1198
The default IPSec ifup script in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 through 5 configures racoon to use aggressive IKE mode instead of main IKE mode, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute force attacks by sniffing an unencrypted preshared key (PSK) hash. La secuencia de comandos por defecto IPSec ifup en Red Hat Enterprise Linux de 3 a 5 configura racoon para utilizar el modo agresivo de IKE en vez del modo principal de IKE, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de fuerza bruta husmeando una clave hash que no ha sido compartida sin encriptar (PSK). • http://secunia.com/advisories/48045 http://www.ernw.de/download/pskattack.pdf http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019563 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435274 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41053 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-1198 •
CVE-2008-0003 – tog-pegasus pam authentication buffer overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-0003
Stack-based buffer overflow in the PAMBasicAuthenticator::PAMCallback function in OpenPegasus CIM management server (tog-pegasus), when compiled to use PAM and without PEGASUS_USE_PAM_STANDALONE_PROC defined, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-5360. Un desbordamiento del búfer en la región stack de la memoria en la función PAMBasicAuthenticator::PAMCallback en el servidor de administración de OpenPegasus CIM (tog-pegasus), cuando es compilado para usar PAM y sin PEGASUS_USE_PAM_STANDALONE_PROC definida, podría permitir a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de vectores desconocidos, una vulnerabilidad diferente de CVE -2007-5360. • http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01438409 http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2008/000014.html http://osvdb.org/40082 http://secunia.com/advisories/28338 http://secunia.com/advisories/28462 http://secunia.com/advisories/29056 http://secunia.com/advisories/29785 http://secunia.com/advisories/29986 http://securitytracker.com/id?1019159 http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2008-January/001879.html http://www.redhat.com/support/ • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow •
CVE-2007-6285 – autofs default doesn't set nodev in /net
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2007-6285
The default configuration for autofs 5 (autofs5) in some Linux distributions, such as Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 4 and 5, does not specify the nodev mount option for the -hosts map, which allows local users to access "important devices" by operating a remote NFS server and creating special device files on that server, as demonstrated by the /dev/mem device. La configuración predeterminada para autofs 5 (autofs5) en algunas distribuciones de Linux, como Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) versiones 4 y 5, no especifica la opción de montaje nodev para el mapa -hosts, que permite a los usuarios locales acceder a "important devices" mediante la operación de un servidor NFS remoto y creando archivos de dispositivo especial en ese servidor, como es demostrado por el dispositivo /dev/mem. • http://osvdb.org/40442 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1176.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1177.html http://secunia.com/advisories/28156 http://secunia.com/advisories/28168 http://secunia.com/advisories/28456 http://securitytracker.com/id?1019137 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:009 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26970 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426218 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/39188 • CWE-16: Configuration •
CVE-2007-5494 – open(O_ATOMICLOOKUP) leaks dentry
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2007-5494
Memory leak in the Red Hat Content Accelerator kernel patch in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 4 and 5 allows local users to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of open requests involving O_ATOMICLOOKUP. Una pérdida de memoria en el parche del kernel de Red Hat Content Accelerator en Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) versiones 4 y 5, permite a usuarios locales causar una denegación de servicio (consumo de memoria) por medio de un gran número de peticiones abiertas que involucran a O_ATOMICLOOKUP. • http://osvdb.org/44153 http://secunia.com/advisories/27824 http://secunia.com/advisories/28162 http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2007-0993.html http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2007-1104.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26657 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019017 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315051 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/38823 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •