Page 89 of 450 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

bark_noise_hybridmp in psy.c in Xiph.Org libvorbis 1.3.6 has a stack-based buffer over-read. bark_noise_hybridmp en psy.c en Xiph.Org libvorbis 1.3.6 tiene una sobrelectura de búfer basada en pila. A stack-based buffer overflow was found in the encoder functionality of the libvorbis library. An attacker could create a malicious file to cause a denial of service, crashing the application containing the library. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3703 https://gitlab.xiph.org/xiph/vorbis/issues/2334 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/11/msg00031.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00023.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-36 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-10393 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574194 • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 76%CPEs: 70EXPL: 4

Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. Spring Framework, en versiones 5.0 anteriores a la 5.0.5 y versiones 4.3 anteriores a la 4.3.15, así como versiones más antiguas no soportadas, permite que las aplicaciones expongan STOMP en endpoints WebSocket con un simple agente STOMP en memoria a través del módulo spring-messaging. Un usuario (o atacante) malicioso puede manipular un mensaje al agente que desemboca en un ataque de ejecución remota de código. Pivotal Spring Java Framework versions 5.0.x and below suffer from a remote code execution vulnerability. • https://github.com/CaledoniaProject/CVE-2018-1270 https://github.com/Venscor/CVE-2018-1270 https://github.com/tafamace/CVE-2018-1270 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103696 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2939 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4ed49b103f64a0cecb38064f26cbf1389afc12124653da2d35166dbe%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-358: Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 87%CPEs: 174EXPL: 1

In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. En Apache Log4j 2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.8.2, cuando se utiliza el servidor de socket TCP o el servidor de socket UDP para recibir sucesos de registro serializados de otra aplicación, puede enviarse una carga binaria especialmente diseñada que, cuando se deserializa, puede ejecutar código arbitrario. It was found that when using remote logging with log4j socket server the log4j server would deserialize any log event received via TCP or UDP. An attacker could use this flaw to send a specially crafted log event that, during deserialization, would execute arbitrary code in the context of the logger application. • https://github.com/pimps/CVE-2017-5645 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97702 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040200 http://www.securit • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 24%CPEs: 62EXPL: 2

Integer overflow in the _gd2GetHeader function in gd_gd2.c in the GD Graphics Library (aka libgd) before 2.2.3, as used in PHP before 5.5.37, 5.6.x before 5.6.23, and 7.x before 7.0.8, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted chunk dimensions in an image. Desbordamiento de entero en la función _gd2GetHeader en gd_gd2.c en la GD Graphics Library (también conocido como libgd) en versiones anteriores a 2.2.3, como se utiliza en PHP en versiones anteriores a 5.5.37, 5.6.x en versiones anteriores a 5.6.23 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.8, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica y caída de aplicación) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de dimensiones del pedazo en una imagen manipulada. An integer overflow flaw, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow was found in the imagecreatefromgd2() function of PHP's gd extension. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash a PHP application or execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the user running that PHP application using gd via a specially crafted GD2 image. • http://github.com/php/php-src/commit/7722455726bec8c53458a32851d2a87982cf0eac?w=1 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00003.html http://php.net/ChangeLog-5.php http://php.net/ChangeLog-7.php http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2598.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2750.html http://www.debian.org/securit • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 94%CPEs: 109EXPL: 0

The RFC 5011 implementation in rdata.c in ISC BIND 9.7.x and 9.8.x before 9.8.5-P2, 9.8.6b1, 9.9.x before 9.9.3-P2, and 9.9.4b1, and DNSco BIND 9.9.3-S1 before 9.9.3-S1-P1 and 9.9.4-S1b1, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and named daemon exit) via a query with a malformed RDATA section that is not properly handled during construction of a log message, as exploited in the wild in July 2013. La implementación RFC en rdata.c en ISC BIND 9.7.x y 9.8.x anterior a 9.8.5-P2, 9.8.6b1, 9.9.x anterior a 9.9.3-P2, y 9.9.4b1, y DNSco BIND 9.9.3-S1 anterior a 9.9.3-S1-P1 y 9.9.4-S1b1, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (fallo de aserción y salida de demonio) a través de una petición con una sección RDATA manipulada que se maneja adecuadamente durante la contrucción de mensaje de log. Ha sido explotada "in the wild" en Julio de 2013. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service condition on vulnerable installations of ISC BIND. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of an rdata section with a length that is less than four. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-08/0030.html http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0103.html http://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2014-1244 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-August/113108.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-August/113251.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-08/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-08/msg00018.html http://rhn. •