Page 89 of 1056 results (0.009 seconds)

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 5%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0

The Quagga BGP daemon (bgpd) prior to version 1.2.3 can double-free memory when processing certain forms of UPDATE message, containing cluster-list and/or unknown attributes. A successful attack could cause a denial of service or potentially allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. El demonio Quagga BGP (bgpd), en versiones anteriores a la 1.2.3, puede realizar una doble liberación (double free) de memoria al procesar ciertos formularios de un mensaje UPDATE que contienen atributos cluster-list y/o desconocidos. Un ataque con éxito podría provocar una denegación de servicio (DoS) o permitir que un atacante ejecute código arbitrario. A double-free vulnerability was found in Quagga. • http://savannah.nongnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=9095 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/940439 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103105 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0377 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-451142.pdf https://gogs.quagga.net/Quagga/quagga/src/master/doc/security/Quagga-2018-1114.txt https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/02/msg00021.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201804-17 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3573-1 • CWE-415: Double Free CWE-416: Use After Free •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0

The futex_requeue function in kernel/futex.c in the Linux kernel before 4.14.15 might allow attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact by triggering a negative wake or requeue value. La función futex_requeue en kernel/futex.c en el kernel de Linux, en versiones anteriores a la 4.14.15, podría permitir que atacantes provoquen una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento de enteros) o que puedan causar otro tipo de impacto sin especificar desencadenando un valor wake o requeue negativo. The futex_requeue function in kernel/futex.c in the Linux kernel, before 4.14.15, might allow attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impacts by triggering a negative wake or requeue value. Due to the nature of the flaw, privilege escalation cannot be fully ruled out, although we believe it is unlikely. • http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=fbe0e839d1e22d88810f3ee3e2f1479be4c0aa4a http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103023 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0654 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0676 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1062 https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/fbe0e839d1e22d88810f3ee3e2f1479be4c0aa4a https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/05/msg00000.html https://usn.ubuntu.com/3619-1 https://usn.ubuntu. • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 59%CPEs: 22EXPL: 2

LibreOffice before 5.4.5 and 6.x before 6.0.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via =WEBSERVICE calls in a document, which use the COM.MICROSOFT.WEBSERVICE function. LibreOffice, en versiones anteriores a la 5.4.5 y versiones 6.x anteriores a la 6.0.1, permite que atacantes remotos lean archivos arbitrarios mediante llamadas =WEBSERVICE en un documento, que emplea la función COM.MICROSOFT.WEBSERVICE. A flaw was found in libreoffice before 5.4.5 and before 6.0.1. Arbitrary remote file disclosure may be achieved by the use of the WEBSERVICE formula in a specially crafted ODS file. LibreOffice suffers from a remote arbitrary file disclosure vulnerability. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44022 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0418 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0517 https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-5-4-5&id=a916fc0c0e0e8b10cb4158fa0fa173fe205d434a https://github.com/jollheef/libreoffice-remote-arbitrary-file-disclosure https://usn.ubuntu.com/3579-1 https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4111 https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/security/advisories/cve-2018-1055 https://access.red • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 13EXPL: 28

Go before 1.8.7, Go 1.9.x before 1.9.4, and Go 1.10 pre-releases before Go 1.10rc2 allow "go get" remote command execution during source code build, by leveraging the gcc or clang plugin feature, because -fplugin= and -plugin= arguments were not blocked. Go, en versiones anteriores a la 1.8.7; Go en versiones 1.9.x anteriores a la 1.9.4 y los prelanzamientos de Go 1.10 anteriores a Go 1.10rc2 permiten la ejecución remota de comandos "go get" durante la construcción del código fuente aprovechando la característica del plugin gcc o clang debido a que los argumentos -fplugin= y -plugin= no se bloquearon. An arbitrary command execution flaw was found in the way Go's "go get" command handled gcc and clang sensitive options during the build. A remote attacker capable of hosting malicious repositories could potentially use this flaw to cause arbitrary command execution on the client side. • https://github.com/neargle/Go-Get-RCE-CVE-2018-6574-POC https://github.com/qweraqq/CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/frozenkp/CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/darthvader-htb/CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/antunesmpedro/CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/asavior2/CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/Dannners/CVE-2018-6574-go-get-RCE https://github.com/jftierno/-CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/ItsFadinG/CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/OLAOLAOLA789/CVE-2018-6574 htt • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0

In dbus-proxy/flatpak-proxy.c in Flatpak before 0.8.9, and 0.9.x and 0.10.x before 0.10.3, crafted D-Bus messages to the host can be used to break out of the sandbox, because whitespace handling in the proxy is not identical to whitespace handling in the daemon. En dbus-proxy/flatpak-proxy.c en Flatpak en versiones anteriores a la 0.8.9, 0.9.x y 0.10.x anteriores a la 0.10.3, se pueden utilizar mensajes D-Bus manipulados para salir del sandbox, ya que la gestión de los espacios en blanco en el proxy no es idéntica a cómo gestiona el demonio los espacios en blanco. It was found that flatpak's D-Bus proxy did not properly filter the access to D-Bus during the authentication protocol. A specially crafted flatpak application could use this flaw to bypass all restrictions imposed by flatpak and have full access to the D-BUS interface. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2766 https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/commit/52346bf187b5a7f1c0fe9075b328b7ad6abe78f6 https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/releases/tag/0.10.3 https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/releases/tag/0.8.9 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-6560 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542207 • CWE-270: Privilege Context Switching Error CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict •