CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 104EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0714 – tomcat: Security Manager bypass via persistence mechanisms
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0714
The session-persistence implementation in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.45, 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 mishandles session attributes, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and execute arbitrary code in a privileged context via a web application that places a crafted object in a session. La implementación de persistencia de sesión en Apache Tomcat 6.x en versiones anteriores a 6.0.45, 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.68, 8.x en versiones anteriores a 8.0.31 y 9.x en versiones anteriores a 9.0.0.M2 no maneja correctamente atributos de sesión, lo que permite a usuarios remotos autenticados eludir las restricciones de SecurityManager previstas y ejecutar código arbitrario en un contexto privilegiado a través de una aplicación web que sitúa un objeto manipulado en una sesión. It was found that several Tomcat session persistence mechanisms could allow a remote, authenticated user to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and execute arbitrary code in a privileged context via a web application that placed a crafted object in a session. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00069.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00082.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00085.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145974991225029&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1089.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2045.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 240EXPL: 0CVE-2014-7810 – Tomcat/JbossWeb: security manager bypass via EL expressions
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-7810
The Expression Language (EL) implementation in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.44, 7.x before 7.0.58, and 8.x before 8.0.16 does not properly consider the possibility of an accessible interface implemented by an inaccessible class, which allows attackers to bypass a SecurityManager protection mechanism via a web application that leverages use of incorrect privileges during EL evaluation. La implementación Expression Language (EL) en Apache Tomcat 6.x anterior a 6.0.44, 7.x anterior a 7.0.58, y 8.x anterior a 8.0.16 no considera correctamente la posibilidad de una interfaz accesible implementada por una clase no accesible, lo que permite a atacantes evadir un mecanismo de protección SecurityManager a través de una aplicación web que aprovecha el uso de privilegios incorrectos durante la evaluación EL. It was found that the expression language resolver evaluated expressions within a privileged code section. A malicious web application could use this flaw to bypass security manager protections. • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145974991225029&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1621.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1622.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0492.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2046.html http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1644018 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1645642 http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html http://tomcat.apach • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 6.4EPSS: 94%CPEs: 110EXPL: 0CVE-2014-0227 – Tomcat/JBossWeb: request smuggling and limited DoS in ChunkedInputFilter
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0227
java/org/apache/coyote/http11/filters/ChunkedInputFilter.java in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.42, 7.x before 7.0.55, and 8.x before 8.0.9 does not properly handle attempts to continue reading data after an error has occurred, which allows remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks or cause a denial of service (resource consumption) by streaming data with malformed chunked transfer coding. java/org/apache/coyote/http11/filters/ChunkedInputFilter.java en Apache Tomcat 6.x anterior a 6.0.42, 7.x anterior a 7.0.55, y 8.x anterior a 8.0.9 no maneja correctamente los intentos de seguir leyendo datos después de un error haya ocurrido, lo que permite a atacantes remotos realizar ataques de la infiltración de solicitudes HTTP o causar una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos) mediante la transmisión de datos con la codificación malformada de transferencias fragmentadas. It was discovered that the ChunkedInputFilter in Tomcat did not fail subsequent attempts to read input after malformed chunked encoding was detected. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to make Tomcat process part of the request body as new request, or cause a denial of service. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2015-0081.html http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2015-02/0067.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-February/150282.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143393515412274&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143403519711434&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0675.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0720.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0765.html http://rhn.redhat.com/erra • CWE-19: Data Processing Errors CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 7%CPEs: 114EXPL: 0CVE-2014-0230 – tomcat: non-persistent DoS attack by feeding data by aborting an upload
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0230
Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.44, 7.x before 7.0.55, and 8.x before 8.0.9 does not properly handle cases where an HTTP response occurs before finishing the reading of an entire request body, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (thread consumption) via a series of aborted upload attempts. Apache Tomcat 6.x en versiones anteriores a 6.0.44, 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.55 y 8.x en versiones anteriores a 8.0.9 no maneja adecuadamente los casos en los que se produce una respuesta HTTP antes de terminar la lectura de una petición de cuerpo entero, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (consumo de hilo) a través de una serie de intentos de carga abortada. It was found that Tomcat would keep connections open after processing requests with a large enough request body. A remote attacker could potentially use this flaw to exhaust the pool of available connections and preventing further, legitimate connections to the Tomcat server to be made. • http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-announce/201505.mbox/%3C554949D1.8030904%40apache.org%3E http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144498216801440&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145974991225029&w=2 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/04/10/1 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1621.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1622.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2661.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0595.html http:/ • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 6%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0CVE-2013-4444
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-4444
Unrestricted file upload vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.40, in certain situations involving outdated java.io.File code and a custom JMX configuration, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by uploading and accessing a JSP file. Vulnerabilidad de la subida de ficheros sin restricciones Apache Tomcat 7.x anterior a 7.0.40, en ciertas situaciones que implican código anticuado java.io.File y configuración JMX personalizada, permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario mediante la subida y el acceso a un archivo JSP. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-09/0075.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144498216801440&w=2 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/10/24/12 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Jan/23 http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3447 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/69728 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1030834 https://h20564&# • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •