Page 9 of 44 results (0.007 seconds)

CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 142EXPL: 1

Multiple vulnerabilities in the Cisco IOx application hosting environment on multiple Cisco platforms could allow an attacker to inject arbitrary commands into the underlying host operating system, execute arbitrary code on the underlying host operating system, install applications without being authenticated, or conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the affected software. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Múltiples vulnerabilidades en el entorno de alojamiento de aplicaciones Cisco IOx en varias plataformas de Cisco podrían permitir a un atacante inyectar comandos arbitrarios en el sistema operativo anfitrión subyacente, ejecutar código arbitrario en el sistema operativo anfitrión subyacente, instalar aplicaciones sin ser autenticado o conducir un ataque de tipo cross-site scripting (XSS) contra un usuario del software afectado. Para más información sobre estas vulnerabilidades, consulte la sección Details de este aviso • https://github.com/orangecertcc/security-research/security/advisories/GHSA-8v5w-4fhm-gqxj https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-iox-yuXQ6hFj • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

A vulnerability in the HTTP client feature of Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to read and modify data that should normally have been sent via an encrypted channel. The vulnerability is due to TCP port information not being considered when matching new requests to existing, persistent HTTP connections. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by acting as a man-in-the-middle and then reading and/or modifying data that should normally have been sent through an encrypted channel. Una vulnerabilidad en la funcionalidad HTTP client de los Software Cisco IOS y IOS XE, podría permitir a un atacante remoto no autenticado leer y modificar datos que normalmente deberían haber sido enviados por medio de un canal encriptado. La vulnerabilidad es debido a que no ha sido considerada la información del puerto TCP al hacer coincidir nuevas peticiones con conexiones HTTP persistentes y existentes. • https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20190925-http-client • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •

CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

A vulnerability in the Cisco Network Plug and Play agent, also referred to as the Cisco Open Plug-n-Play agent, of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a memory leak on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending invalid data to the Cisco Network Plug and Play agent on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a memory leak on the affected device, which could cause the device to reload. Una vulnerabilidad en el agente Cisco Network Plug and Play también llamado agente Cisco Open Plug-n-Play, de Cisco IOS Software y Cisco IOS XE Software podría permitir que un atacante remoto no autenticado provoque una fuga de memoria en un dispositivo afectado. • https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-19-094-02 https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180926-pnp-memleak • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •

CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 1%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

A vulnerability in the Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software function that restores encapsulated option 82 information in DHCP Version 4 (DHCPv4) packets could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to reload, resulting in a Relay Reply denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability exists because the affected software performs incomplete input validation of encapsulated option 82 information that it receives in DHCPOFFER messages from DHCPv4 servers. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted DHCPv4 packet to an affected device, which the device would then forward to a DHCPv4 server. When the affected software processes the option 82 information that is encapsulated in the response from the server, an error could occur. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103545 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040591 https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-18-107-04 https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-18-107-05 https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180328-dhcpr2 https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2018-06 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •