CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 341EXPL: 0CVE-2022-1389
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1389
On all versions of 16.1.x, 15.1.x, 14.1.x, 13.1.x, 12.1.x, and 11.6.x of F5 BIG-IP (fixed in 17.0.0), a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility. This vulnerability allows an attacker to run a limited set of commands: ping, traceroute, and WOM diagnostics. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated En todas las versiones de 16.1.x, 15.1.x, 14.1.x, 13.1.x, 12.1.x y 11.6.x de F5 BIG-IP (corregida en 17.0.0), Se presenta una vulnerabilidad de tipo cross-site request forgery (CSRF) en una página no revelada de la utilidad de configuración de BIG-IP. Esta vulnerabilidad permite a un atacante ejecutar un conjunto limitado de comandos: ping, traceroute y diagnósticos WOM. Nota: Las versiones de software que han alcanzado el Fin del Soporte Técnico (EoTS) no son evaluadas • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K49905324 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 341EXPL: 0CVE-2022-27189
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-27189
On F5 BIG-IP 16.1.x versions prior to 16.1.2.2, 15.1.x versions prior to 15.1.5.1, 14.1.x versions prior to 14.1.4.6, 13.1.x versions prior to 13.1.5, and all versions of 12.1.x and 11.6.x, when an Internet Content Adaptation Protocol (ICAP) profile is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause an increase in Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) memory resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated En F5 BIG-IP versiones 16.1.x anteriores a 16.1.2.2, en las versiones 15.1.x anteriores a 15.1.5.1, en las versiones 14.1.x anteriores a 14.1.4.6, en las versiones 13.1.x anteriores a 13.1.5 y en todas las versiones de 12.1.x y 11.6.x, cuando es configurado un perfil de protocolo de adaptación de contenidos de Internet (ICAP) en un servidor virtual, el tráfico no revelado puede causar un aumento en el uso de recursos de memoria del Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM). Nota: Las versiones de software que han alcanzado el Fin del Soporte Técnico (EoTS) no son evaluadas • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K16187341 • CWE-681: Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types •
CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 341EXPL: 0CVE-2022-26835
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-26835
On F5 BIG-IP 16.1.x versions prior to 16.1.2.2, 15.1.x versions prior to 15.1.5.1, 14.1.x versions prior to 14.1.4.6, 13.1.x versions prior to 13.1.5, and all versions of 12.1.x and 11.6.x, directory traversal vulnerabilities exist in undisclosed iControl REST endpoints and TMOS Shell (tmsh) commands in F5 BIG-IP Guided Configuration, which may allow an authenticated attacker with at least resource administrator role privileges to read arbitrary files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated En F5 BIG-IP versiones 16.1.x anteriores a 16.1.2.2, las versiones 15.1.x anteriores a 15.1.5.1, las versiones 14.1.x anteriores a 14.1.4.6, las versiones 13.1.x anteriores a 13.1.5 y todas las versiones de 12.1.x y 11.6 x, se presentan vulnerabilidades de salto de directorio en los endpoints REST de iControl no revelados y en los comandos TMOS Shell (tmsh) en F5 BIG-IP Guided Configuration, que pueden permitir a un atacante autenticado con privilegios de rol de administrador de recursos, como mínimo, leer archivos arbitrarios. Nota: Las versiones de software que han alcanzado el Fin del Soporte Técnico (EoTS) no son evaluadas • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K53197140 • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 60EXPL: 1CVE-2002-20001
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-20001
The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE. El Protocolo de Acuerdo de Claves Diffie-Hellman permite a atacantes remotos (del lado del cliente) enviar números arbitrarios que en realidad no son claves públicas, y desencadenar costosos cálculos de exponenciación modular DHE del lado del servidor, también se conoce como un ataque D(HE)ater. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-506569.pdf https://dheatattack.com https://dheatattack.gitlab.io https://github.com/Balasys/dheater https://github.com/mozilla/ssl-config-generator/issues/162 https://gitlab.com/dheatattack/dheater https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10374117 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K83120834 https://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2022-004.txt https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2022/10/21/tls-groups-configuration https: • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •