CVSS: 8.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2020-15176 – SQL injection in GLPI
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-15176
07 Oct 2020 — In GLPI before version 9.5.2, when supplying a back tick in input that gets put into a SQL query,the application does not escape or sanitize allowing for SQL Injection to occur. Leveraging this vulnerability an attacker is able to exfiltrate sensitive information like passwords, reset tokens, personal details, and more. The issue is patched in version 9.5.2 En GLPI versiones anteriores a 9.5.2, cuando se suministra un back tick en la entrada que se coloca en una consulta SQL, la aplicación no escapa ni se s... • https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/commit/f021f1f365b4acea5066d3e57c6d22658cf32575 • CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 9%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1CVE-2020-15175 – Unauthenticated File Deletion in GLPI
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-15175
07 Oct 2020 — In GLPI before version 9.5.2, the `pluginimage.send.php` endpoint allows a user to specify an image from a plugin. The parameters can be maliciously crafted to instead delete the .htaccess file for the files directory. Any user becomes able to read all the files and folders contained in “/files/”. Some of the sensitive information that is compromised are the user sessions, logs, and more. An attacker would be able to get the Administrators session token and use that to authenticate. • https://github.com/Xn2/GLPwn • CWE-552: Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2020-11031 – Insecure encryption algorithm in GLPI
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-11031
23 Sep 2020 — In GLPI before version 9.5.0, the encryption algorithm used is insecure. The security of the data encrypted relies on the password used, if a user sets a weak/predictable password, an attacker could decrypt data. This is fixed in version 9.5.0 by using a more secure encryption library. The library chosen is sodium. En GLPI versiones anteriores a 9.5.0, el algoritmo de cifrado usado no es seguro. • https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/commit/f1ae6c8481e5c19a6f1801a5548cada45702e01a#diff-b5d0ee8c97c7abd7e3fa29b9a27d1780 • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2020-15108 – SQL Injection in glpi
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-15108
17 Jul 2020 — In glpi before 9.5.1, there is a SQL injection for all usages of "Clone" feature. This has been fixed in 9.5.1. En glpi versiones anteriores a 9.5.1, se presenta una inyección SQL para todos los usos de la funcionalidad "Clone". Esto ha sido corregido en 9.5.1 • https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/commit/a4baa64114eb92fd2adf6056a36e0582324414ba • CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') •
CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 15%CPEs: 1EXPL: 4CVE-2020-11060 – Remote Code Execution in GLPI
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-11060
12 May 2020 — In GLPI before 9.4.6, an attacker can execute system commands by abusing the backup functionality. Theoretically, this vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker without a valid account by using a CSRF. Due to the difficulty of the exploitation, the attack is only conceivable by an account having Maintenance privileges and the right to add WIFI networks. This is fixed in version 9.4.6. En GLPI versiones anteriores a 9.4.6, un atacante puede ejecutar comandos del sistema al abusar de la funcionalidad back... • https://packetstorm.news/files/id/163119 • CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •
CVSS: 6.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2020-11062 – Reflexive XSS in GLPI
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-11062
12 May 2020 — In GLPI after 0.68.1 and before 9.4.6, multiple reflexive XSS occur in Dropdown endpoints due to an invalid Content-Type. This has been fixed in version 9.4.6. En GLPI versiones posteriores a 0.68.1 y anteriores a 9.4.6, se producen múltiples ataques de tipo XSS reflexivos en los endpoints Dropdown debido a un Content-Type no válido. Esto ha sido corregido en la versión 9.4.6. • https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/commit/5e1c52c5e8a30ceb4e9572964da7ed89ddfb1aaf • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 2%CPEs: 1EXPL: 2CVE-2020-5248 – Public GLPIKEY can be used to decrypt any data in GLPI
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-5248
12 May 2020 — GLPI before before version 9.4.6 has a vulnerability involving a default encryption key. GLPIKEY is public and is used on every instance. This means anyone can decrypt sensitive data stored using this key. It is possible to change the key before installing GLPI. But on existing instances, data must be reencrypted with the new key. • https://github.com/indevi0us/CVE-2020-5248 • CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials •
CVSS: 7.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1CVE-2020-11036 – XSS in GLPI
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-11036
05 May 2020 — In GLPI before version 9.4.6 there are multiple related stored XSS vulnerabilities. The package is vulnerable to Stored XSS in the comments of items in the Knowledge base. Adding a comment with content "<script>alert(1)</script>" reproduces the attack. This can be exploited by a user with administrator privileges in the User-Agent field. It can also be exploited by an outside party through the following steps: 1. • https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/security/advisories/GHSA-3g3h-rwhr-7385 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2020-11035 – weak CSRF tokens in GLPI
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-11035
05 May 2020 — In GLPI after version 0.83.3 and before version 9.4.6, the CSRF tokens are generated using an insecure algorithm. The implementation uses rand and uniqid and MD5 which does not provide secure values. This is fixed in version 9.4.6. En GLPI posterior a la versión 0.83.3 y versiones anteriores a 9.4.6, los tokens CSRF son generados usando un algoritmo no seguro. La implementación utiliza rand y uniqid y MD5 que no proporcionan valores seguros. • https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/security/advisories/GHSA-w7q8-58qp-vmpf • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 28%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2020-11034 – bypass of manageRedirect in GLPI
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-11034
05 May 2020 — In GLPI before version 9.4.6, there is a vulnerability that allows bypassing the open redirect protection based which is based on a regexp. This is fixed in version 9.4.6. En GLPI versiones anteriores a 9.4.6, se presenta una vulnerabilidad que permite omitir la protección de redireccionamiento abierto el cual es basada en un regexp. Esto es corregido en la versión 9.4.6. • https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/security/advisories/GHSA-gxv6-xq9q-37hg • CWE-185: Incorrect Regular Expression CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') •