CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 80%CPEs: 28EXPL: 2CVE-2019-17571 – log4j: deserialization of untrusted data in SocketServer
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-17571
Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data. This affects Log4j versions up to 1.2 up to 1.2.17. Incluido en Log4j versión 1.2 existe una clase SocketServer que es vulnerable a la deserialización de datos no confiables, que pueden ser explotada para ejecutar código arbitrario remotamente cuando se combina con un dispositivo de deserialización al escuchar el tráfico de red no confiable para datos de registro. Esto afecta a Log4j versiones desde 1.2 hasta 1.2.17. A flaw was discovered in Log4j, where a vulnerable SocketServer class may lead to the deserialization of untrusted data. • https://github.com/shadow-horse/CVE-2019-17571 https://github.com/Al1ex/CVE-2019-17571 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00022.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/277b4b5c2b0e06a825ccec565fa65bd671f35a4d58e3e2ec5d0618e1%40%3Cdev.tika.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/44491fb9cc19acc901f7cff34acb7376619f15638439416e3e14761c%40%3Cdev.tika.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/479471e6debd608c837b9815b76eab24676657d4444fcfd5ef96d6e6%40%3Cdev.tika.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache& • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1551 – rsaz_512_sqr overflow bug on x86_64
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1551
There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00030.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155754/Slackware-Security-Advisory-openssl-Updates.html https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=419102400a2811582a7a3d4a4e317d72e5ce0a8f https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f1c5eea8a817075d31e43f5876993c6710238c98 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00023.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/messag • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 114EXPL: 0CVE-2018-15756 – DoS Attack via Range Requests
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-15756
Spring Framework, version 5.1, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.10, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.20, and older unsupported versions on the 4.2.x branch provide support for range requests when serving static resources through the ResourceHttpRequestHandler, or starting in 5.0 when an annotated controller returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. A malicious user (or attacker) can add a range header with a high number of ranges, or with wide ranges that overlap, or both, for a denial of service attack. This vulnerability affects applications that depend on either spring-webmvc or spring-webflux. Such applications must also have a registration for serving static resources (e.g. JS, CSS, images, and others), or have an annotated controller that returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105703 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/339fd112517e4873695b5115b96acdddbfc8f83b10598528d37c7d12%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77886fec378ee6064debb1efb6b464a4a0173b2ff0d151ed86d3a228%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7b156ee50ba3ecce87b33c06bf7a749d84ffee55e69bfb5eca88fcc3%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8a1fe70534fc52ff5c9db5ac29c55657f802cbefd7e9d9850c7052bd%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 13EXPL: 13CVE-2018-11776 – Apache Struts Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-11776
Apache Struts versions 2.3 to 2.3.34 and 2.5 to 2.5.16 suffer from possible Remote Code Execution when alwaysSelectFullNamespace is true (either by user or a plugin like Convention Plugin) and then: results are used with no namespace and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace and similar to results, same possibility when using url tag which doesn't have value and action set and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace. Apache Struts, desde la versión 2.3 hasta la 2.3.34 y desde la versión 2.5 hasta la 2.5.16, sufre de una posible ejecución remota de código cuando el valor de alwaysSelectFullNamespace es "true" (establecido por el usuario o por un plugin como Convention Plugin). Además, los resultados se emplean sin ningún espacio de nombres y, al mismo tiempo, el paquete superior no tiene espacio de nombres o contiene caracteres comodín. De manera similar a como pasa con los resultados, existe la misma posibilidad al emplear la etiqueta url, que no tiene un valor y acción definidos y, además, su paquete superior no tiene espacio de nombres o contiene caracteres comodín. Apache Struts contains a vulnerability that allows for remote code execution under two circumstances. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45260 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45367 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45262 https://github.com/hook-s3c/CVE-2018-11776-Python-PoC https://github.com/xfox64x/CVE-2018-11776 https://github.com/bhdresh/CVE-2018-11776 https://github.com/jiguangsdf/CVE-2018-11776 https://github.com/brianwrf/S2-057-CVE-2018-11776 https://github.com/knqyf263/CVE-2018-11776 https://github.com/cucadili/CVE-2018-11776 https://github.co •