CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 30EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1000805 – python-paramiko: Authentication bypass in auth_handler.py
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1000805
Paramiko version 2.4.1, 2.3.2, 2.2.3, 2.1.5, 2.0.8, 1.18.5, 1.17.6 contains a Incorrect Access Control vulnerability in SSH server that can result in RCE. This attack appear to be exploitable via network connectivity. Paramiko en versiones 2.4.1, 2.3.2, 2.2.3, 2.1.5, 2.0.8, 1.18.5 y 1.17.6 contiene una vulnerabilidad de control de acceso incorrecto en el servidor SSH que puede resultar en la ejecución remota de código. Este ataque parece ser explotable mediante conectividad de red. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3497 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3347 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3406 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505 https://github.com/paramiko/paramiko/issues/1283 https://herolab.usd.de/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/usd20180023.txt https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/10/msg00018.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/12/msg00025.html https://usn.ubuntu.com/3796-1 h • CWE-305: Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10873 – spice: Missing check in demarshal.py:write_validate_array_item() allows for buffer overflow and denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10873
A vulnerability was discovered in SPICE before version 0.14.1 where the generated code used for demarshalling messages lacked sufficient bounds checks. A malicious client or server, after authentication, could send specially crafted messages to its peer which would result in a crash or, potentially, other impacts. Se ha descubierto una vulnerabilidad en SPICE en versiones anteriores a la 0.14.1 en la que el código generado utilizado para deserializar mensajes carecía de comprobaciones de límites suficientes. Un cliente o servidor malicioso, después de la autenticación, podría enviar mensajes especialmente manipulados a su peer, lo que resultaría en un cierre inesperado o, potencialmente, otros impactos. A vulnerability was discovered in SPICE where the generated code used for demarshalling messages lacked sufficient bounds checks. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105152 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2732 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3470 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10873 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-common/commit/bb15d4815ab586b4c4a20f4a565970a44824c42c https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/08/msg00035.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/08/msg00037.html https://lists.debi • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 8.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10915 – postgresql: Certain host connection parameters defeat client-side security defenses
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10915
A vulnerability was found in libpq, the default PostgreSQL client library where libpq failed to properly reset its internal state between connections. If an affected version of libpq was used with "host" or "hostaddr" connection parameters from untrusted input, attackers could bypass client-side connection security features, obtain access to higher privileged connections or potentially cause other impact through SQL injection, by causing the PQescape() functions to malfunction. Postgresql versions before 10.5, 9.6.10, 9.5.14, 9.4.19, and 9.3.24 are affected. Se ha encontrado una vulnerabilidad en qemu-img, la biblioteca de cliente por defecto de PostgreSQL por la que libpq fracasa a la hora de restablecer su estado interno entre conexiones. Si se emplea una versión afectada de libpq se emplea con parámetros de conexión "host" o "hostaddr" desde entradas no fiables, los atacantes podrían omitir características de seguridad de conexión del lado del cliente, obtener acceso a conexiones con mayores privilegios o, posiblemente, provocar otro tipo de impacto mediante una inyección SQL. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-08/msg00043.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105054 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041446 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2511 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2557 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2565 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2566 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2643 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2721 https://access.redhat.com/errata&#x • CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-665: Improper Initialization •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 74%CPEs: 127EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5390 – Linux kernel versions 4.9+ can be forced to make very expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5390
Linux kernel versions 4.9+ can be forced to make very expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service. El kernel de Linux en versiones 4.9 y siguientes pueden forzarse a realizar llamadas muy caras a tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() y tcp_prune_ofo_queue() para cada paquete entrante, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. A flaw named SegmentSmack was found in the way the Linux kernel handled specially crafted TCP packets. A remote attacker could use this flaw to trigger time and calculation expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() functions by sending specially modified packets within ongoing TCP sessions which could lead to a CPU saturation and hence a denial of service on the system. Maintaining the denial of service condition requires continuous two-way TCP sessions to a reachable open port, thus the attacks cannot be performed using spoofed IP addresses. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2018-004.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20181031-02-linux-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104976 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041424 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041434 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 92EXPL: 1CVE-2018-13405 – Linux (Ubuntu) - Other Users coredumps Can Be Read via setgid Directory and killpriv Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-13405
The inode_init_owner function in fs/inode.c in the Linux kernel through 3.16 allows local users to create files with an unintended group ownership, in a scenario where a directory is SGID to a certain group and is writable by a user who is not a member of that group. Here, the non-member can trigger creation of a plain file whose group ownership is that group. The intended behavior was that the non-member can trigger creation of a directory (but not a plain file) whose group ownership is that group. The non-member can escalate privileges by making the plain file executable and SGID. La función inode_init_owner en fs/inode.c en el kernel de Linux hasta la versión 3.16 permite a los usuarios locales crear archivos con una propiedad de grupo no deseada, en un escenario donde un directorio es SGID a un cierto grupo y es escribible por un usuario que no es miembro de ese grupo. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45033 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0fa3ecd87848c9c93c2c828ef4c3a8ca36ce46c7 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/07/13/2 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106503 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2948 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3083 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3096 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0717 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA- • CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management CWE-284: Improper Access Control •