7 results (0.021 seconds)

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 165EXPL: 2

SNMPv3 HMAC verification in (1) Net-SNMP 5.2.x before 5.2.4.1, 5.3.x before 5.3.2.1, and 5.4.x before 5.4.1.1; (2) UCD-SNMP; (3) eCos; (4) Juniper Session and Resource Control (SRC) C-series 1.0.0 through 2.0.0; (5) NetApp (aka Network Appliance) Data ONTAP 7.3RC1 and 7.3RC2; (6) SNMP Research before 16.2; (7) multiple Cisco IOS, CatOS, ACE, and Nexus products; (8) Ingate Firewall 3.1.0 and later and SIParator 3.1.0 and later; (9) HP OpenView SNMP Emanate Master Agent 15.x; and possibly other products relies on the client to specify the HMAC length, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass SNMP authentication via a length value of 1, which only checks the first byte. Una comprobación SNMPv3 HMAC en (1) Net-SNMP versión 5.2.x anterior a 5.2.4.1, versión 5.3.x anterior a 5.3.2.1 y versión 5.4.x anterior a 5.4.1.1; (2) UCD-SNMP; (3) eCos; (4) C-series versión 1.0.0 hasta 2.0.0 de Juniper Session and Resource Control (SRC); (5) Data de NetApp (también se conoce como Network Appliance) ONTAP versiones 7.3RC1 y 7.3RC2; (6) SNMP Research versión anterior a 16.2; (7) múltiples productos Cisco IOS, CatOS, ACE y Nexus; (8) Ingate Firewall versión 3.1.0 y posterior y SIParator versión 3.1.0 y posterior; (9) HP OpenView SNMP Emanate Master Agent versión 15.x; y posiblemente otros productos dependen del cliente para especificar la longitud del HMAC, lo que facilita que los atacantes remotos omitan la autenticación SNMP por medio de un valor de longitud de 1, que solo comprueba el primer byte. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5790 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2008//Jun/msg00002.html http://lists.ingate.com/pipermail/productinfo/2008/000021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-08/msg00000.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127730470825399&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0528.html http://secunia.com/advisories/30574 http://secunia.com/advisories/30596 http://secunia.com/advisories/30612 http://secunia.c • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 22EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) implementation in Cisco IOS 12.3 and 12.4 on Cisco Access Points and 1310 Wireless Bridges (Wireless EAP devices), IOS 12.1 and 12.2 on Cisco switches (Wired EAP devices), and CatOS 6.x through 8.x on Cisco switches allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a crafted EAP Response Identity packet. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en la implementación Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) en Cisco IOS 12.3 y 12.4 sobre Cisco Access Points y 1310 Wireless Bridges (Wireless EAP devices), IOS 12.1 y 12.2 sobre Cisco switches (Wired EAP dispositivos), y CatOS 6.x hasta la 8.x sobre Cisco switches permite a atacantes remotos provocar denegación de servicio (recarga de dispositivo) a través de un paquete EAP Response Identity manipulado. • http://secunia.com/advisories/27329 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a00808de8bb.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26139 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018842 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3566 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/37300 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5288 •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 1

Cisco Catalyst 6500 and Cisco 7600 series devices use 127/8 IP addresses for Ethernet Out-of-Band Channel (EOBC) internal communication, which might allow remote attackers to send packets to an interface for which network exposure was unintended. Las series de dispositivos Cisco Catalyst 6500 y Cisco 7600 utilizan direcciones IP 127/8 para el Canal Ethernet Fuera de Banda (EOBC, Ethernet Out-of-Band Channel), lo cual permite a atacantes remotos enviar paquetes a una interfaz para la cual la exposición de la red no era intencionada. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2007/Sep/0573.html http://secunia.com/advisories/26988 http://securitytracker.com/id?1018742 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sr-20070926-lb.shtml http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25822 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018743 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3276 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/36826 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 167EXPL: 1

Unspecified Cisco Catalyst Switches allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash) via an IP packet with the same source and destination IPs and ports, and with the SYN flag set (aka LanD). NOTE: the provenance of this issue is unknown; the details are obtained solely from the BID. Conmutadores Cisco Catalyst no especificados permiten a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída de dispositivo) mediante un paquete IP con IPs y puertos de origen y destino iguales y con la bandera SYN. (tcc LanD). NOTA: La proveniencia de esta cuestión es desconocida; los detalles son obtenidos exclusivamente de BID. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15864 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/44543 •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 294EXPL: 0

Cisco CatOS 5.x before 5.5(20) through 8.x before 8.2(2) and 8.3(2)GLX, as used in Catalyst switches, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (system crash and reload) by sending invalid packets instead of the final ACK portion of the three-way handshake to the (1) Telnet, (2) HTTP, or (3) SSH services, aka "TCP-ACK DoS attack." Cisco CatOS anteriores a 5.5(20) a 8.x anteriores a 8.2(2) y 8.3(3) GLX, usados en conmutadores Catalyst, permiten a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída del sistema y reinicio) enviando paquétes no válidos en lugar de la porción final ACK del apretón de manos (handshake) en tres pasos a los servicios (1) Telnet, (2) HTTP, o (3) SSH. También conocida como aka "ataque de DoS TCP-ACK ". • http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20040609-catos.shtml http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/245190 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16370 •