93 results (0.008 seconds)

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 54EXPL: 44

A security regression (CVE-2006-5051) was discovered in OpenSSH's server (sshd). There is a race condition which can lead sshd to handle some signals in an unsafe manner. An unauthenticated, remote attacker may be able to trigger it by failing to authenticate within a set time period. Se encontró una condición de ejecución del controlador de señales en el servidor de OpenSSH (sshd), donde un cliente no se autentica dentro de los segundos de LoginGraceTime (120 de forma predeterminada, 600 en versiones anteriores de OpenSSH), luego se llama al controlador SIGALRM de sshd de forma asincrónica. Sin embargo, este controlador de señales llama a varias funciones que no son seguras para señales asíncronas, por ejemplo, syslog(). • https://github.com/l0n3m4n/CVE-2024-6387 https://github.com/thegenetic/CVE-2024-6387-exploit https://github.com/d0rb/CVE-2024-6387 https://github.com/devarshishimpi/CVE-2024-6387-Check https://github.com/AiGptCode/ssh_exploiter_CVE-2024-6387 https://github.com/Symbolexe/CVE-2024-6387 https://github.com/xonoxitron/regreSSHion https://github.com/PrincipalAnthony/CVE-2024-6387-Updated-x64bit https://github.com/4lxprime/regreSSHive https://github.com/shamo0/CVE-2024-6387_PoC https:&# • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') CWE-364: Signal Handler Race Condition •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 1

sendmail through 8.17.2 allows SMTP smuggling in certain configurations. Remote attackers can use a published exploitation technique to inject e-mail messages with a spoofed MAIL FROM address, allowing bypass of an SPF protection mechanism. This occurs because sendmail supports <LF>.<CR><LF> but some other popular e-mail servers do not. This is resolved in 8.18 and later versions with 'o' in srv_features. sendmail hasta al menos 8.14.7 permite el contrabando SMTP en ciertas configuraciones. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/24/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/25/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/26/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/29/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/30/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/30/3 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-51765 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255869 ht • CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 79EXPL: 1

The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/176280/Terrapin-SSH-Connection-Weakening.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Mar/21 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/18/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/19/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/20/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/17/8 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-48 • CWE-222: Truncation of Security-relevant Information CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

In versions of FreeBSD 12.4-RELEASE prior to 12.4-RELEASE-p7 and FreeBSD 13.2-RELEASE prior to 13.2-RELEASE-p5 the __sflush() stdio function in libc does not correctly update FILE objects' write space members for write-buffered streams when the write(2) system call returns an error.  Depending on the nature of an application that calls libc's stdio functions and the presence of errors returned from the write(2) system call (or an overridden stdio write routine) a heap buffer overflow may occur. Such overflows may lead to data corruption or the execution of arbitrary code at the privilege level of the calling program. En las versiones 12.4-RELEASE anteriores a 12.4-RELEASE-p7 y 13.2-RELEASE anteriores a 13.2-RELEASE-p5 de FreeBSD, la función stdio __sflush() en libc no actualiza correctamente los miembros del espacio de escritura de los objetos FILE para secuencias con búfer de escritura cuando la llamada al sistema write(2) devuelve un error. Dependiendo de la naturaleza de una aplicación que llama a las funciones stdio de libc y la presencia de errores devueltos por la llamada al sistema write(2) (o una rutina de escritura stdio anulada), puede ocurrir un desbordamiento del buffer del heap. • https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-23:15.stdio.asc https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231214-0004 • CWE-131: Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

On an msdosfs filesystem, the 'truncate' or 'ftruncate' system calls under certain circumstances populate the additional space in the file with unallocated data from the underlying disk device, rather than zero bytes. This may permit a user with write access to files on a msdosfs filesystem to read unintended data (e.g. from a previously deleted file). En un sistema de archivos msdosfs, las llamadas al sistema 'truncate' o 'ftruncate' bajo ciertas circunstancias llenan el espacio adicional en el archivo con datos no asignados del dispositivo de disco subyacente, en lugar de cero bytes. Esto puede permitir que un usuario con acceso de escritura a archivos en un sistema de archivos msdosfs lea datos no deseados (por ejemplo, de un archivo previamente eliminado). • https://dfir.ru/2023/11/01/bringing-unallocated-data-back-the-fat12-16-32-case https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-23:12.msdosfs.asc https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231124-0004 • CWE-1188: Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default •