CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 45%CPEs: 21EXPL: 3CVE-2023-50387 – bind9: KeyTrap - Extreme CPU consumption in DNSSEC validator
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-50387
13 Feb 2024 — Certain DNSSEC aspects of the DNS protocol (in RFC 4033, 4034, 4035, 6840, and related RFCs) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via one or more DNSSEC responses, aka the "KeyTrap" issue. One of the concerns is that, when there is a zone with many DNSKEY and RRSIG records, the protocol specification implies that an algorithm must evaluate all combinations of DNSKEY and RRSIG records. Ciertos aspectos DNSSEC del protocolo DNS (en RFC 4035 y RFC relacionados) permiten a ataca... • https://github.com/knqyf263/CVE-2023-50387 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0CVE-2023-3341 – A stack exhaustion flaw in control channel code may cause named to terminate unexpectedly
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-3341
20 Sep 2023 — The code that processes control channel messages sent to `named` calls certain functions recursively during packet parsing. Recursion depth is only limited by the maximum accepted packet size; depending on the environment, this may cause the packet-parsing code to run out of available stack memory, causing `named` to terminate unexpectedly. Since each incoming control channel message is fully parsed before its contents are authenticated, exploiting this flaw does not require the attacker to hold a valid RND... • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/20/2 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 35EXPL: 0CVE-2022-2795 – Processing large delegations may severely degrade resolver performance
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-2795
21 Sep 2022 — By flooding the target resolver with queries exploiting this flaw an attacker can significantly impair the resolver's performance, effectively denying legitimate clients access to the DNS resolution service. Al inundar el resolvedor de destino con consultas que explotan este fallo, un atacante puede perjudicar significativamente el rendimiento del resolvedor, negando efectivamente a los clientes legítimos el acceso al servicio de resolución DNS A flaw was found in bind. When flooding the target resolver wit... • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/21/3 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 48EXPL: 0CVE-2021-25215 – An assertion check can fail while answering queries for DNAME records that require the DNAME to be processed to resolve itself
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-25215
29 Apr 2021 — In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.11 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, when a vulnerable version of named receives a query for a record triggering the flaw described above, the named process will terminate due to a failed assertion check. The vulnerability affects all currently maintained BIND 9 branches (9.11, 9.11-S, 9.16, 9.16-S, 9.17) as well as... • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/1 • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 24%CPEs: 45EXPL: 0CVE-2021-25216 – A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-25216
29 Apr 2021 — In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for... • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/1 • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 0CVE-2020-8622 – A truncated TSIG response can lead to an assertion failure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8622
21 Aug 2020 — In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker on the network path for a TSIG-signed request, or operating the server receiving the TSIG-signed request, could send a truncated response to that request, triggering an assertion failure, causing the server to exit. Alternately, an off-path attacker would have to correctly guess when a TSIG-signed request was sent, along with other characteristics of the pack... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 9%CPEs: 20EXPL: 1CVE-2020-8616 – BIND does not sufficiently limit the number of fetches performed when processing referrals
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8616
19 May 2020 — A malicious actor who intentionally exploits this lack of effective limitation on the number of fetches performed when processing referrals can, through the use of specially crafted referrals, cause a recursing server to issue a very large number of fetches in an attempt to process the referral. This has at least two potential effects: The performance of the recursing server can potentially be degraded by the additional work required to perform these fetches, and The attacker can exploit this behavior to us... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 92%CPEs: 31EXPL: 5CVE-2020-8617 – A logic error in code which checks TSIG validity can be used to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8617
19 May 2020 — Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whose configuration does not otherwise make use of it, almost all current BIND servers are vulnerable. In releases of BIND dating from March 2018 and after, an assertion check in tsig.c detects this inconsistent state and deliberately e... • https://packetstorm.news/files/id/180550 • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5741 – Update policies krb5-subdomain and ms-subdomain do not enforce controls promised in their documentation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5741
16 Jan 2019 — To provide fine-grained controls over the ability to use Dynamic DNS (DDNS) to update records in a zone, BIND 9 provides a feature called update-policy. Various rules can be configured to limit the types of updates that can be performed by a client, depending on the key used when sending the update request. Unfortunately, some rule types were not initially documented, and when documentation for them was added to the Administrator Reference Manual (ARM) in change #3112, the language that was added to the ARM... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 58%CPEs: 45EXPL: 0CVE-2016-9131 – bind: assertion failure while processing response to an ANY query
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-9131
12 Jan 2017 — named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.9-P5, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P5, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0-P2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a malformed response to an RTYPE ANY query. named en ISC BIND 9.x en versiones anteriores a 9.9.9-P5, 9.10.x en versiones anteriores a 9.10.4-P5 y 9.11.x en versiones anteriores a 9.11.0-P2 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (fallo de aserción y salida de demonio) a través de una respuesta mal for... • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0062.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •