CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 213EXPL: 7CVE-2021-45105 – Apache Log4j2 does not always protect from infinite recursion in lookup evaluation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-45105
Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. Apache Log4j2 versiones 2.0-alpha1 hasta 2.16.0 (excluyendo las versiones 2.12.3 y 2.3.1) no protegían de la recursión no controlada de las búsquedas autorreferenciales. Esto permite a un atacante con control sobre los datos de Thread Context Map causar una denegación de servicio cuando es interpretada una cadena diseñada. • https://github.com/thedevappsecguy/Log4J-Mitigation-CVE-2021-44228--CVE-2021-45046--CVE-2021-45105--CVE-2021-44832 https://github.com/tejas-nagchandi/CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/pravin-pp/log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-1 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-dileepdkumar-https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-v htt • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •
CVSS: 4.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2021-2353
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-2353
Vulnerability in the Siebel Core - Server Framework product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Loging). Supported versions that are affected are 21.5 and Prior. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Siebel Core - Server Framework executes to compromise Siebel Core - Server Framework. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Siebel Core - Server Framework accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.4 (Confidentiality impacts). • https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2021.html •
CVSS: 3.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 0CVE-2021-34428 – jetty: SessionListener can prevent a session from being invalidated breaking logout
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-34428
For Eclipse Jetty versions <= 9.4.40, <= 10.0.2, <= 11.0.2, if an exception is thrown from the SessionListener#sessionDestroyed() method, then the session ID is not invalidated in the session ID manager. On deployments with clustered sessions and multiple contexts this can result in a session not being invalidated. This can result in an application used on a shared computer being left logged in. Para Eclipse Jetty versiones anteriores a 9.4.40 incluyéndola, versiones anteriores a 10.0.2 incluyéndola, versiones anteriores a 11.0.2 incluyéndola, si es lanzada una excepción desde el método SessionListener#sessionDestroyed(), el ID de sesión no es invalidado en el administrador de ID de sesión. En despliegues con sesiones agrupadas y múltiples contextos esto puede resultar en que una sesión no sea invalidada. • https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-m6cp-vxjx-65j6 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r67c4f90658fde875521c949448c54c98517beecdc7f618f902c620ec%40%3Cissues.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8a1a332899a1f92c8118b0895b144b27a78e3f25b9d58a34dd5eb084%40%3Cnotifications.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbefa055282d52d6b58d29a79fbb0be65ab0a38d25f00bd29eaf5e6fd%40%3Cnotifications.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rddbb4f8d5db23265bb63d14ef4b3723b438abc1589f877db11d35450%40%3Cissues.zo • CWE-613: Insufficient Session Expiration •
CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 60EXPL: 0CVE-2021-25329 – Incomplete fix for CVE-2020-9484
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-25329
The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue. La corrección para el CVE-2020-9484 estaba incompleta. Cuando se usa Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.0, versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.41, versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.61 o versiones 7.0.0. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/01/2 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r11ce01e8a4c7269b88f88212f21830edf73558997ac7744f37769b77%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r732b2ca289dc02df2de820e8775559abd6c207f159e39f559547a085%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8a2ac0e476dbfc1e6440b09dcc782d444ad635d6da26f0284725a5dc%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb51ccd58b2152fc75125b2406fc93e04ca9d34e737263faa6ff0f41f%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https:/ • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 55EXPL: 0CVE-2021-25122 – Apache Tomcat h2c request mix-up
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-25122
When responding to new h2c connection requests, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 could duplicate request headers and a limited amount of request body from one request to another meaning user A and user B could both see the results of user A's request. Cuando se responde a nuevas peticiones de conexión h2c, Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.0, versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.41 y versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.61, podrían duplicar los encabezados de petición y una cantidad limitada del cuerpo de petición de una petición a otra, lo que significa que el usuario A y el usuario B podrían visualizar los resultados de la petición del usuario A A flaw was found in Apache Tomcat. When responding to new h2c connection requests, Apache Tomcat could duplicate request headers and a limited amount of request body from one request to another meaning user A and user B could both see the results of user A's request. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/01/1 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7b95bc248603360501f18c8eb03bb6001ec0ee3296205b34b07105b7%40%3Cannounce.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7b95bc248603360501f18c8eb03bb6001ec0ee3296205b34b07105b7%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7b95bc248603360501f18c8eb03bb6001ec0ee3296205b34b07105b7%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7b95bc248603360501f18c8eb03bb6001ec0ee3296205b34b07105b7%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •